Bug#588276: fixed 588276 in 0.7.0-2

2011-01-17 Thread Marc Dequènes (Duck)
Coin, On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 16:07:39 +0100, Marc Dequènes (Duck) wrote: As you said you could not reproduce, i tested again with 0.5.0-2, and could not reproduce either (but with a machine in unstable and experimental xorg). So i'll try with a cleaner configuration (which is don't have acces

Bug#588276: fixed 588276 in 0.7.0-2

2011-01-16 Thread Julien Cristau
user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertag 588276 squeeze-can-defer tag 588276 squeeze-ignore kthxbye On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 16:07:39 +0100, Marc Dequènes (Duck) wrote: > As you said you could not reproduce, i tested again with 0.5.0-2, > and could not reproduce either (but with a machi

Bug#588276: fixed 588276 in 0.7.0-2

2011-01-09 Thread Marc Dequènes (Duck)
Quoting Simon McVittie : I do notice that 0.7.0 builds libnotify4, not libnotify1, so I assume you had to upgrade something else to use it; are you sure the fix couldn't have been in another package you upgraded? I remember upgrading libnotify-bin only, so as to test using notify-send and no

Bug#588276: fixed 588276 in 0.7.0-2

2011-01-08 Thread Simon McVittie
On Sat, 08 Jan 2011 at 22:02:50 +, Simon McVittie wrote: > Looking through the git log from 0.5.0 to 0.7.0, nothing jumps out at me as > likely to fix this (unless someone fixed it by mistake / in passing while > porting to GDBus or something). I can't reproduce this in a squeeze VM with xfce4

Bug#588276: fixed 588276 in 0.7.0-2

2011-01-08 Thread Simon McVittie
On Mon, 27 Dec 2010 at 03:07:26 +0100, Marc Dequènes (Duck) wrote: > Quoting Julien Cristau : > >On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 11:46:51 +0100, Marc Dequènes wrote: > >>fixed 588276 0.7.0-2 > >Does this mean there is a known fix for this bug? > > Unfortunately not that i am aware of. I just saw the packa

Bug#588276: fixed 588276 in 0.7.0-2

2010-12-26 Thread Marc Dequènes (Duck)
Coin, Quoting Julien Cristau : On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 11:46:51 +0100, Marc Dequènes wrote: fixed 588276 0.7.0-2 thanks Does this mean there is a known fix for this bug? Unfortunately not that i am aware of. I just saw the package in experimental, and wondered if it was solving my probl

Bug#588276: fixed 588276 in 0.7.0-2

2010-12-23 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 11:46:51 +0100, Marc Dequènes wrote: > fixed 588276 0.7.0-2 > thanks > Does this mean there is a known fix for this bug? Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature