Bug#585496: [pkg-cryptsetup-devel] Bug#585496: Bug#585496: Bug#585496: cryptsetup: replace check scripts by new versions

2010-06-16 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 20:28 +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote: > i disagree here. good documentation at the right place is a key feature, > especially for security software. But right now, this is not the case > i agree with you on that. but simple > scripts, cluttered with tons of comment lines, which e

Bug#585496: [pkg-cryptsetup-devel] Bug#585496: Bug#585496: Bug#585496: cryptsetup: replace check scripts by new versions

2010-06-16 Thread Jonas Meurer
hey christoph, On 16/06/2010 Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 15:50 +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote: > > thanks, i've applied some changes to the check scripts in svn trunk, > > please take a look. unfortunately (as written in the previous mail), > > your scripts are cluttered. th

Bug#585496: [pkg-cryptsetup-devel] Bug#585496: Bug#585496: cryptsetup: replace check scripts by new versions

2010-06-16 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 15:50 +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote: > thanks, i've applied some changes to the check scripts in svn trunk, > please take a look. unfortunately (as written in the previous mail), > your scripts are cluttered. these scripts really should be as simple as > possible, and the code in

Bug#585496: [pkg-cryptsetup-devel] Bug#585496: cryptsetup: replace check scripts by new versions

2010-06-16 Thread Jonas Meurer
hey christoph, On 11/06/2010 Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > I'd have written replacements for all of the current check scripts. > They should work identical to the current ones (I did some basic tests, > but please validate my code). thanks, i've applied some changes to the check scripts in sv

Bug#585496: cryptsetup: replace check scripts by new versions

2010-06-10 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
Package: cryptsetup Version: 2:1.1.2-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Hi Jonas. I'd have written replacements for all of the current check scripts. They should work identical to the current ones (I did some basic tests, but please validate my code). Improvements would be: - All other check scri