Hi Andrey,
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:49:18 +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 12:32:51AM +0200, Ove Kåven wrote:
> > Den 16. mai 2011 17:53, skrev Alessio Treglia:
> > > any news on this?
> >
> > I've been more busy than I thought, and won't have much time for the
> > next 3
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 12:32:51AM +0200, Ove Kåven wrote:
> Den 16. mai 2011 17:53, skrev Alessio Treglia:
> > any news on this?
>
> I've been more busy than I thought, and won't have much time for the
> next 3 weeks.
>
> It might happen sooner if Stephen Kitt were to write the get-orig-source
>
Hi again,
On Sat, 21 May 2011 10:06:35 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 12:32:51AM +0200, Ove Kåven wrote:
> > It might happen sooner if Stephen Kitt were to write the get-orig-source
> > rule for wine-gecko for me, so I wouldn't have to spend time on that
> > myself. If so, p
Hi Ove,
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 12:32:51AM +0200, Ove Kåven wrote:
> Den 16. mai 2011 17:53, skrev Alessio Treglia:
> > any news on this?
>
> I've been more busy than I thought, and won't have much time for the
> next 3 weeks.
>
> It might happen sooner if Stephen Kitt were to write the get-orig
Den 16. mai 2011 17:53, skrev Alessio Treglia:
> any news on this?
I've been more busy than I thought, and won't have much time for the
next 3 weeks.
It might happen sooner if Stephen Kitt were to write the get-orig-source
rule for wine-gecko for me, so I wouldn't have to spend time on that
mysel
Hi guys,
any news on this?
Thanks in advance for any replies.
--
Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com
Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org
Ubuntu Core Developer | quadris...@ubuntu.com
0FEC 59A5 E18E E04F 6D40 593B 45D4 8C7C DCFC 3FD0
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi
Den 27. april 2011 13:51, skrev Jairot Llopis:
> Ove kindly sponsored my mingw-w64 packages; one of them is already in
> unstable, the other two are waiting in NEW. Once they're all in he
> will be
> able (at last!) to start working on new versions of wine.
>
>
> I just wanted to
>
> Ove kindly sponsored my mingw-w64 packages; one of them is already in
> unstable, the other two are waiting in NEW. Once they're all in he will be
> able (at last!) to start working on new versions of wine.
I just wanted to remind you that, if I am not wrong, all mingw-w64 packages
are alrea
Those are very good news.
I think this is one of the most important packages for desktop users.
It's a shame that I don't have any C or C++ experience for helping anybody.
At least I hope to give you some encouragement ;)
2011/3/28 Ove Kaaven
>
> Then maybe we can finally get back to making some
Den 27. mars 2011 23:07, skrev Stephen Kitt:
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:08:39 +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 09:27:14AM +0100, Yajo wrote:
I brought this up a week ago. The blocker right now is getting gcc-4.5
into sid first. Once that's in place, hopefully Ove wil
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:08:39 +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 09:27:14AM +0100, Yajo wrote:
> > > I brought this up a week ago. The blocker right now is getting gcc-4.5
> > > into sid first. Once that's in place, hopefully Ove will be around to
> > > review and sponsor work,
Hello.
El 21/03/11 06:08, Stephen Kitt escribió:
[snip] I'm not sure though that allowing wine-unstable into
testing would be a good idea, since testing is the next stable and I'm
not sure we'd want to ship wine-unstable in stable.
But for some people/applications wine-unstable work
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 09:27:14AM +0100, Yajo wrote:
> > I brought this up a week ago. The blocker right now is getting gcc-4.5
> > into sid first. Once that's in place, hopefully Ove will be around to
> > review and sponsor work, otherwise the MIA/orphaning process will need
> > to be started.
> I brought this up a week ago. The blocker right now is getting gcc-4.5
> into sid first. Once that's in place, hopefully Ove will be around to
> review and sponsor work, otherwise the MIA/orphaning process will need
> to be started.
We have already gcc-4.5 in sid and testing.
> I vote for thi
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 16:35:42 -0500, Deniz Akcal wrote:
>
> Any update on packaging Wine for Debian now?
> Now that we're past Squeeze being stable, can 1.2 be put into Sid=>Testing
> and the latest Wine in experimental?
I brought this up a week ago. The blocker right now is getting gcc-4.5
into
Any update on packaging Wine for Debian now?
Now that we're past Squeeze being stable, can 1.2 be put into Sid=>Testing and
the latest Wine in experimental?
I vote for this bug:
* 1.2.1 is marked as stable
* 1.3.4 is nice to have in "experimental"
--
With best regards,
Dmitry
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
I'd also like to request that for amd64, a full 64-bit Wine can now be
included. It's pretty complicated to get it all built, but with a
combination of 32-bit Wine and 64-bit Wine on the same system, it's
now possible to run Win16, Win32, and Win64 applications all on the
same system. This could
On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 17:23 +0200, Ove Kaaven wrote:
> Den 10. juni 2010 13:08, skrev Svante R Signell:
> > Package: wine
> > Version: 1.0.1-3
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Tags: experimental sid
> >
> > Since the wine 1.2 release candidates are available now why not package
> > them for experimental,
Den 10. juni 2010 13:08, skrev Svante R Signell:
Package: wine
Version: 1.0.1-3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: experimental sid
Since the wine 1.2 release candidates are available now why not package
them for experimental, and later on when 1.2.x is out for sid. In
experimental the latest version is 1
Package: wine
Version: 1.0.1-3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: experimental sid
Since the wine 1.2 release candidates are available now why not package
them for experimental, and later on when 1.2.x is out for sid. In
experimental the latest version is 1.1.24 : (
Thanks!
-- System Information:
Debian R
21 matches
Mail list logo
