Bug#585145: gtimelog in Debian

2011-11-18 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Nov 18, 2011, at 11:16 AM, Simon McVittie wrote: >Any progress on this? > >experimental now has pygobject 3.0.2-2 - I assume this will go to unstable >as part of GNOME 3.2, but you'd have to ask the GNOME team about that. Ah sorry, not yet. UDS basically distracted me. I'll work on that next

Bug#585145: gtimelog in Debian

2011-11-18 Thread Simon McVittie
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 at 10:03:25 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 at 14:26:41 -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote: > > * experimental has python-gobject 2.90.3-2 (unstable has 2.28.6-5). > > * gir1.2-pango-1.0 and gir1.2-gtk-3.0 both seem okay in unstable. > > * afaict, gir1.2-appindicato

Bug#585145: gtimelog in Debian

2011-10-12 Thread Simon McVittie
On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 at 14:26:41 -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote: > I just wanted to follow up since I released a new gtimelog (0.7.0) both > upstream and for Ubuntu 11.10. (FYI, neither I nor Lars will be notified if you just mail the bug: for bugs in normal Debian packages, the maintainer is automatica