I came across another failure recently ultimately traceable to #643560
and hence to #583958. I'm afraid that reading the bug log for #583958
leaves me rather confused about what the current situation is. AIUI
the fix for #643560 depends on #583958. And the latter wants to go
upstream first.
Ste
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 09:36:23PM +0200, Nicolas François wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:56:15PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Yep, I've just looked over the shadow code that handles USERGROUPS_ENAB; you
> > (and ceg) are correct that the USERGROUPS_ENAB option should twiddle the
> > umas
Hello,
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:56:15PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> Yep, I've just looked over the shadow code that handles USERGROUPS_ENAB; you
> (and ceg) are correct that the USERGROUPS_ENAB option should twiddle the
> umask rather than overriding it entirely.
On the PAM side, are you
Martin Pitt [2011-06-24 8:24 +0200]:
> my previous patch didn't update the md5sums, this one does now.
Meh -- attached now, sorry.
Martin
--
Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)
=== modified file 'debia
Hello again,
my previous patch didn't update the md5sums, this one does now. It got
merged into the Ubuntu branch after review from Steve.
Martin
--
Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSC
Hello all,
I created a branch and merge proposal [1] for this, it's working
nicely here. Thanks to pam-auth-update pam_umask also gets added on
upgrade.
I also attach the changes as a patch for offline convenience.
If you are happy with this, I can also send a patch for
http://bugs.debian.org/58
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 08:28:38AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> An alternative would be to comment out the UMASK setting by default,
> and only then have pam_umask default to an implicit "022, with
> USERGROUPS_ENAB relaxing to 002". As soon as login.defs,
> /etc/default/login, or any of the other p
Hello all,
C. Gatzemeier [2010-05-31 22:57 +0200]:
> Enabling "pam_umask usergroups" (now that pam_umask is available) will
> re-enable debian's user private group setup to work correctly.
>
> There is a
> patch to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/253096 that
> adds comments and
Package: libpam-modules
(Filing this, to track the TODOs from the discussion that followed
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2010/05/msg00887.html)
Enabling "pam_umask usergroups" (now that pam_umask is available) will
re-enable debian's user private group setup to work correctly.
There is a
9 matches
Mail list logo
