On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 07:26:52PM +0300, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
> Le samedi 17 avril 2010 18:11:07 Reinhard Tartler, vous avez écrit :
> > The patch in question [1] seems to be written by you and Felix last
> > year. Would you and Felix be willing to relicense the patch under LGPL?
>
> I will
Le samedi 17 avril 2010 18:11:07 Reinhard Tartler, vous avez écrit :
> The patch in question [1] seems to be written by you and Felix last
> year. Would you and Felix be willing to relicense the patch under LGPL?
I will relicense to LGPL if/when upstream live uses a publicly accessible
source con
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 16:11:13 (CEST), Remi Denis-Courmont wrote:
> The liblivemedia-dev packages applies a patch explicitly licensed under
> the GPL. In my understanding, this makes the resulting binaries GPL.
This matches my understanding.
> Yet the copyright file claims Debian provides the
Package: liblivemedia-dev
Version: 2010.02.10-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.3
Hello,
The liblivemedia-dev packages applies a patch explicitly licensed under
the GPL. In my understanding, this makes the resulting binaries GPL.
Yet the copyright file claims Debian provides t
4 matches
Mail list logo
