Quoting Jon Marler (jmar...@debian.org):
> >Hello Jon,
> >
> >Have you been able to sort things out?
> >
> >if the FTBFS is #584745, I think the report is too incomplete for
> >being properly processed. The bug submitter never followed up,
> >also. I'd suggest tagging "moreinfo" and ignoring ATM.
>
>Hello Jon,
>
>Have you been able to sort things out?
>
>if the FTBFS is #584745, I think the report is too incomplete for
>being properly processed. The bug submitter never followed up,
>also. I'd suggest tagging "moreinfo" and ignoring ATM.
It's a valid bug. It is super easy to reproduce ... ju
Quoting Jonathan Marler (jmar...@debian.org):
> > Ping. This review process happened about 3 months ago. Would it be
> > possible to consider an upload with these changes applied?
> >
> > I begin to think about one of my usual "l10n NMU" but wanted to first
> > discuss with package maintainer(s) i
Quoting Jonathan Marler (jmar...@debian.org):
> > Ping. This review process happened about 3 months ago. Would it be
> > possible to consider an upload with these changes applied?
> >
> > I begin to think about one of my usual "l10n NMU" but wanted to first
> > discuss with package maintainer(s) i
> Ping. This review process happened about 3 months ago. Would it be
> possible to consider an upload with these changes applied?
>
> I begin to think about one of my usual "l10n NMU" but wanted to first
> discuss with package maintainer(s) in case something else is holding
> off a new upload.
I
5 matches
Mail list logo
