Bug#575781: Please resolve IPv6 gateway too

2024-04-15 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Control: tags -1 - patch [Philipp Kern 2013-05-04] > Scrap that. We want to implement gethostbyname4, which is what nss-myhostname > does. This returns gaih_addrtuple instead of hostents, which are able to > bear scope IDs. OK. Assume a different patch is needed and remove the patch tag. -- Ha

Bug#575781: Please resolve IPv6 gateway too

2013-05-03 Thread Philipp Kern
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 11:54:52PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 02:36:53PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > thanks, looking forward to it. > the patches are attached. Scrap that. We want to implement gethostbyname4, which is what nss-myhostname does. This returns gaih_add

Bug#575781: Please resolve IPv6 gateway too

2013-05-03 Thread Philipp Kern
Control: tag -1 patch Hi, On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 02:36:53PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > thanks, looking forward to it. the patches are attached. Kind regards Philipp Kern From ea73addba30102219b7d66b9ce0735e451957e5a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Philipp Kern Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 01:30

Bug#575781: Please resolve IPv6 gateway too

2013-05-02 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 01.05.2013, 11:08 +0200 schrieb Philipp Kern: > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:29:42AM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > With ipv6, does routing work just as with ipv4? I.e. I look through the > > routing table and pick the entry with a ::0 destination netmask? > > yes. However,

Bug#575781: Please resolve IPv6 gateway too

2013-05-01 Thread Philipp Kern
Hi, On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:29:42AM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > With ipv6, does routing work just as with ipv4? I.e. I look through the > routing table and pick the entry with a ::0 destination netmask? yes. However, there is a twist: The main use case of issuing a »ping6 gateway.localhos

Bug#575781: Please resolve IPv6 gateway too

2010-03-29 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Joachim Breitner [2010.03.29.1129 +0200]: > With ipv6, does routing work just as with ipv4? I.e. I look > through the routing table and pick the entry with a ::0 > destination netmask? That is the simple method, yes. As for the complex method, you can expect a wishlist bug from me soo

Bug#575781: Please resolve IPv6 gateway too

2010-03-29 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi Martin, Am Montag, den 29.03.2010, 10:19 +0200 schrieb martin f krafft: > Package: libnss-gw-name > Version: 0.2-1 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: ipv6 > > % ping6 gateway.localhost > unknown host I would not mind implementing it, but I don’t use ipv6 yet and I’d be programming blindly. With ip

Bug#575781: Please resolve IPv6 gateway too

2010-03-29 Thread martin f krafft
Package: libnss-gw-name Version: 0.2-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: ipv6 % ping6 gateway.localhost unknown host -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.33-2-amd64 (SM