* Guillem Jover | 2010-04-30 06:10:05 [+0200]:
>Hi!
Hi Guillem,
>On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 21:09:20 -0500, Moffett, Kyle D wrote:
>> I believe we have consensus on the port architecture name of "powerpcspe".
>> Is there any chance we can get the attached patch merged soon? I'd like to
>> move forwar
Hi!
On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 21:09:20 -0500, Moffett, Kyle D wrote:
> I believe we have consensus on the port architecture name of "powerpcspe".
> Is there any chance we can get the attached patch merged soon? I'd like to
> move forward with getting an unofficial debian-ports.org repository created
Raphael,
I believe we have consensus on the port architecture name of "powerpcspe".
Is there any chance we can get the attached patch merged soon? I'd like to
move forward with getting an unofficial debian-ports.org repository created
and they won't do that until a patch has been merged to upstre
* Moffett, Kyle D | 2010-04-22 19:17:17 [-0500]:
>Not really... If you build GCC with "--enable-e500_double" it produces code
>that is not quite binary compatible with code generated without that option,
>because it indicates that the GPRs have an extra shadow 32 high bits that
>can be only access
On 2010/04/18 08:39, "Sebastian Andrzej Siewior"
wrote:
> * Guillem Jover | 2010-04-16 09:01:16 [+0200]:
>> Do you see this as a possible workable solution, or is it completely
>> unnacceptable? Did I miss something besides what I listed here?
>
> I don't think it is acceptable due to the points I
* Guillem Jover | 2010-04-16 09:01:16 [+0200]:
>Hi!
Hi Guillem,
>On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 11:38:34 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>> - variant two: a operation like a + b where we call in a library to
>> compute the floating point operation. Here we would put the
>> computation itself i
Hi!
[ Sorry for the delay, been moving house. ]
First I wanted to comment on some things said on the bug reports and
debian-devel.
Yes, lpia was a mistake, I'd have preferred that the Ubuntu people would
have created a new repository with a rebuilt i386 architecture tailored
for Atom processors,
Ping?
Raphael, any chance we could get more discussion or agreement from the dpkg
developers regarding the "e500v2" architecture name? Both Sebastian and I
are in full agreement that the name "e500v2" most accurately describes the
fundamental architecture.
I've included the summarized rationale
* Moffett, Kyle D | 2010-03-25 17:49:33 [-0500]:
>We can just use --enable-e500-double when building (recent?) GCC.
Yep, looks good.
>Ok, so hopefully we can all agree on "e500v2"? That's the name I'm going to
>go ahead and use in my newest build-cycle.
Yep, I think so. However we will see what
On 2010/03/25 16:39, "Sebastian Andrzej Siewior"
wrote:
> * Moffett, Kyle D | 2010-03-24 19:28:06 [-0500]:
>> The e500v1 was never very popular and all of the available parts today
>> support double-precision floating point GPRS. With that said, I'm actually
>> not sure if my current compiler is
* Moffett, Kyle D | 2010-03-23 17:52:57 [-0500]:
>Ah, my apologies. I'd actually already seen that one, but wasn't paying
>enough attention when submitting the bugreport.
I saw in your earlier bug report that you don't have everything built
(yet). At [0] I have more or less complete port of an ol
On 2010/03/23 18:21, "Raphael Hertzog" wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Mar 2010, Kyle Moffett wrote:
>> It has the unfortunate GNU arch triplet of "powerpc-linux-gnuspe", when
>> it should have been "powerpcspe-linux-gnu" or "e500-linux-gnu". This
>> causes much the same problem and has the same solution as
forcemerge 568123 575158
thanks
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010, Kyle Moffett wrote:
> It has the unfortunate GNU arch triplet of "powerpc-linux-gnuspe", when
> it should have been "powerpcspe-linux-gnu" or "e500-linux-gnu". This
> causes much the same problem and has the same solution as the lpia
> architec
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.15.5.6
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
At this time, we have the Debian binutils, gcc, and eglibc packages
building cross-compilers for e500 correctly with just a few minor
patches. A few other packages (libmpfr, libgmp) needed to be
crossbuilt (with minor patches only to
14 matches
Mail list logo
