Bug#573745: python maintainance: next steps

2010-06-15 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le samedi 22 mai 2010 à 10:53 +0200, Andreas Barth a écrit : > > As already pointed out by Joss in another email, is Matthias being > > granted with a veto vote? Can he indefinitely veto people willing to > > join such team even if others are OK with them? If that's the case, we > > believe this si

Bug#573745: python maintainance: next steps

2010-05-29 Thread Vincent Bernat
OoO En cette matinée pluvieuse du samedi 22 mai 2010, vers 10:53, Andreas Barth disait : >> As already pointed out by Joss in another email, is Matthias being >> granted with a veto vote? Can he indefinitely veto people willing to >> join such team even if others are OK with them? If that'

Bug#573745: python maintainance: next steps

2010-05-22 Thread Andreas Barth
* Sandro Tosi (mo...@debian.org) [100521 16:45]: > Please let us reaffirm our "complains" are also technical: try not put them > aside just dealing with the personal situations around Python. I know. However, we basically have two chances re the technical side: Either we could start micro-managi

Bug#573745: python maintainance: next steps

2010-05-21 Thread Ian Jackson
Sandro Tosi writes ("Re: Bug#573745: python maintainance: next steps"): > Please also understand that not receiving any update > could give the impression that nothing is being done (that turned out > it's not this case, but still), so a periodic update like "we

Bug#573745: python maintainance: next steps

2010-05-21 Thread Sandro Tosi
Hello, thanks for the update, and sorry for this late reply. On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 23:08, Andreas Barth wrote: > sorry for not updating this request for such a long time - but things take > longer than I'd like them to take. we understand that it's not an easy task, involving several sub-activ

Bug#573745: python maintainance: next steps

2010-05-13 Thread Andreas Barth
* Ian Jackson (ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk) [100513 15:22]: > I think we do need to consider whether it would be best if the > maintainer put their evident technical skills to use elsewhere. Not > just in the context of one package, but also to so that the project > can see that if you really

Bug#573745: python maintainance: next steps

2010-05-13 Thread Andreas Barth
* Josselin Mouette (j...@debian.org) [100513 03:09]: > Le mercredi 12 mai 2010 à 23:28 +0200, Andreas Barth a écrit : > > > > I don't want to loose Matthias contributions to python > > > > within Debian and the python community. > > > > > > This is completely irrelevant, unless Matthias threatened

Bug#573745: python maintainance: next steps

2010-05-12 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mercredi 12 mai 2010 à 23:28 +0200, Andreas Barth a écrit : > > > I don't want to loose Matthias contributions to python > > > within Debian and the python community. > > > > This is completely irrelevant, unless Matthias threatened to stop > > contributing unless he can keep setting the rules.

Bug#573745: python maintainance: next steps

2010-05-12 Thread Andreas Barth
* Josselin Mouette (j...@debian.org) [100512 17:27]: > Le mardi 11 mai 2010 à 23:08 +0200, Andreas Barth a écrit : > > However, there have been some talks within the tech ctte and with different > > people inside the Debian python community. That needed time, and we prefer > > to get to a resolutio

Bug#573745: python maintainance: next steps

2010-05-12 Thread Josselin Mouette
(Note: this email expresses my personal opinions only, not those of the other proponents.) Le mardi 11 mai 2010 à 23:08 +0200, Andreas Barth a écrit : > However, there have been some talks within the tech ctte and with different > people inside the Debian python community. That needed time, and we

Bug#573745: python maintainance: next steps

2010-05-11 Thread Andreas Barth
Hi, sorry for not updating this request for such a long time - but things take longer than I'd like them to take. However, there have been some talks within the tech ctte and with different people inside the Debian python community. That needed time, and we prefer to get to a resolution a bit l