On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Chris Howie (cdho...@gmail.com):
>> May I ask what the rationale is for not backporting the fix to lenny?
>
> Mostly because, IIRC, the fix is not immediately easy to identity and
> was mixed into a bunch of other updates to CIFS u
Quoting Chris Howie (cdho...@gmail.com):
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 2:43 AM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > This bug has been fixed somewhere in the 3.4 series and I know we had
> > a bug report, aloready, about this.
>
> May I ask what the rationale is for not backporting the fix to lenny?
Mostly b
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 2:43 AM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> This bug has been fixed somewhere in the 3.4 series and I know we had
> a bug report, aloready, about this.
May I ask what the rationale is for not backporting the fix to lenny?
This seems like a potentially risky issue.
--
Chris Howie
Quoting Chris Howie (cdho...@gmail.com):
> Package: smbfs
> Version: 2:3.2.5-4lenny9
>
> After mounting a remote share with smbmount and unmounting it with
> smbumount, the entry in /etc/mtab is not properly removed even though
> the share is in fact unmounted. It must be removed manually, by
> s
4 matches
Mail list logo
