Bug#570673: RFS: enforcer - Maven build rule execution framework

2010-02-20 Thread Gabriele Giacone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Torsten Werner wrote: > yes that would be more consistent with other packages. Do you want to > change the name? Ok, renamed source package: enforced -> maven-enforced binary package: libenforced-java -> libmaven-enforced-plugin-java but I found out

Bug#570673: RFS: enforcer - Maven build rule execution framework

2010-02-20 Thread Torsten Werner
Hi, On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 11:04 PM, Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4...@gmail.com> wrote: > At the moment, I've some doubts about package names. It's a Maven plugin > so maybe libmaven-enforcer-plugin-java would be better than > libenforcer-java. yes that would be more consistent with other packages. Do

Bug#570673: RFS: enforcer - Maven build rule execution framework

2010-02-20 Thread Gabriele Giacone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Torsten Werner wrote: > Hi Gabriele, > > which vcs repo do you use? You should commit the code either to our > svn or git repo because you have set the Maintainer to pkg-java. - From d/control Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org/pkg-java/enforcer.git Vcs-