Bug#570350: pid_ns child_reaper fixes for 2.6.26

2010-06-30 Thread Oleg Nesterov
On 06/29, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 17:23 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > @@ -182,9 +182,12 @@ void zap_pid_ns_processes(struct pid_namespace > > > *pid_ns) > > > rc = sys_wait4(-1, NULL, __WALL, NULL); > > > } while (rc != -ECHILD); > > > > > > - > > > - /* Chil

Bug#570350: pid_ns child_reaper fixes for 2.6.26

2010-06-29 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 17:23 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 06/29, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > I've attempted to cherry-pick and adjust these for 2.6.26; patches > > below. Do these look reasonable or are additional changes required? > > Confused. please see below. > > > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] p

Bug#570350: pid_ns child_reaper fixes for 2.6.26

2010-06-29 Thread Oleg Nesterov
On 06/29, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > I've attempted to cherry-pick and adjust these for 2.6.26; patches > below. Do these look reasonable or are additional changes required? Confused. please see below. > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] pid_ns: zap_pid_ns_processes: fix the ->child_reaper > changing > > comm

Bug#570350: pid_ns child_reaper fixes for 2.6.26

2010-06-28 Thread Ben Hutchings
I'm trying to fix a bug in Linux 2.6.26 as packaged in Debian, which is triggered by the sandbox mechanism in the Chrome/Chromium browser. This appears to have been fixed by Oleg's changes in 2.6.27: commit add0d4dfd660e9e4fd0af3eac3cad23583c9558f Author: Oleg Nest