Bug#570346: nmu: gnucash_2.2.9-4

2010-02-18 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 23:58 +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 18.02.2010, 12:58 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt: > > Micha Lenk writes: > > > nmu gnucash_2.2.9-4 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against libgoffice-0.8 to account > > > for uncoordinated soname bump (closes: #570152)

Bug#570010: Bug#570346: nmu: gnucash_2.2.9-4

2010-02-18 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 18.02.2010, 12:58 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt: > Micha Lenk writes: > > nmu gnucash_2.2.9-4 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against libgoffice-0.8 to account > > for uncoordinated soname bump (closes: #570152)" > > *sigh* > > I'm amazed that the libgoffice-0.8 package is fi

Bug#570010: Bug#570346: nmu: gnucash_2.2.9-4

2010-02-18 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Micha Lenk writes: > nmu gnucash_2.2.9-4 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against libgoffice-0.8 to account for > uncoordinated soname bump (closes: #570152)" *sigh* I'm amazed that the libgoffice-0.8 package is first containing a /usr/lib/libgoffice-0.8.so.7 and then /usr/lib/libgoffice-0.8.so.8. lintia

Bug#570346: nmu: gnucash_2.2.9-4

2010-02-18 Thread Micha Lenk
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu gnucash_2.2.9-4 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against libgoffice-0.8 to account for uncoordinated soname bump (closes: #570152)" -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debi