Hi,
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 23:58 +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 18.02.2010, 12:58 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt:
> > Micha Lenk writes:
> > > nmu gnucash_2.2.9-4 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against libgoffice-0.8 to account
> > > for uncoordinated soname bump (closes: #570152)
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 18.02.2010, 12:58 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt:
> Micha Lenk writes:
> > nmu gnucash_2.2.9-4 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against libgoffice-0.8 to account
> > for uncoordinated soname bump (closes: #570152)"
>
> *sigh*
>
> I'm amazed that the libgoffice-0.8 package is fi
Micha Lenk writes:
> nmu gnucash_2.2.9-4 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against libgoffice-0.8 to account for
> uncoordinated soname bump (closes: #570152)"
*sigh*
I'm amazed that the libgoffice-0.8 package is first containing a
/usr/lib/libgoffice-0.8.so.7 and then /usr/lib/libgoffice-0.8.so.8.
lintia
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu gnucash_2.2.9-4 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against libgoffice-0.8 to account for
uncoordinated soname bump (closes: #570152)"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debi
4 matches
Mail list logo