Petr Rockai writes:
>
> Moreover, xemacs is not supported upstream, so I
> can't do much in that direction either.
If it's not supposed to work then excluding it from emacsen/install
would be easiest. For the #X2205 bit though it's as simple as lower
case "x" like #x2205 instead.
--
To UNSUB
Petr Rockai writes:
> -- well, patches are welcome. I don't run xemacs and I have only very
> limited time for this. Moreover, xemacs is not supported upstream, so I
> can't do much in that direction either.
I understand completely; my own XEmacs installation is mainly for the
sake of compatibil
Hi,
"Aaron M. Ucko" writes:
> Byte-compilation with xemacs21 fails due to two issues:
>
> - haskell-decl-scan.el and haskell-indentation.el require 'syntax,
> which runs into trouble despite the use of noerror because
> xemacs21's syntax.el is present but neglects to provide 'syntax.
> Chan
Package: haskell-mode
Version: 2.7.0-2
Severity: important
Byte-compilation with xemacs21 fails due to two issues:
- haskell-decl-scan.el and haskell-indentation.el require 'syntax,
which runs into trouble despite the use of noerror because
xemacs21's syntax.el is present but neglects to prov
4 matches
Mail list logo
