On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 06:16:05PM +0100, Pierre Chifflier wrote:
> > I didn't do the packaging :-), so I really don't know. Copying back
> > the bug log so that the maintainer get notified. If he does not
> > reply, I'll investigate why it is there and if it is really needed.
>
> I am the maintai
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 11:57:52AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 11:39:43AM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > It's not a question of how many versions are supported in a current
> > release, since on upgrades people will have more than one major
> > version installed. But s
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 11:39:43AM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> It's not a question of how many versions are supported in a current
> release, since on upgrades people will have more than one major
> version installed. But since this package only depends on libpq5
> (client side), I suspect that it
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 10:36:16AM -0800, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> * pg_tapgen should not be distributed with pg_prove.
Hi David,
thanks a lot for your feedback.
I've a final question for Martin then: given that 8.4 is meant to be
released in Squeeze (AFAICT), and given that no versions < 8.3
On Feb 19, 2010, at 2:06 PM, Pierre Chifflier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm adding David (pgTAP author) in CC: of this discussion.
>
> David: this is about finding if binaries (pg_prove and pg_tapgen) should
> be stored in /usr/bin (if it is common to all postgresql versions) or in
> /usr/lib/postgre
Hi all,
I'm adding David (pgTAP author) in CC: of this discussion.
David: this is about finding if binaries (pg_prove and pg_tapgen) should
be stored in /usr/bin (if it is common to all postgresql versions) or in
/usr/lib/postgresql/*/bin if it is version-specific.
The complete discussion can be
Hello all,
Stefano Zacchiroli [2010-02-19 18:59 +0100]:
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 10:08:50PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> > The attached patch addresses this bug, by declaring the ‘/usr/bin/’
> > directory and installing the programs into the correct location.
>
> Actually, I'm not sure the patch i
On 19-Feb-2010, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> postgresql binaries are usually installed under
> /usr/lib/postgresql/*/bin/ and then have symlinks under /usr/bin/
> which pass through /usr/share/postgresql-common/pg_wrapper . Are you
> sure that pg_prove and pg_tagpen should not have the same fate?
N
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 10:08:50PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> The attached patch addresses this bug, by declaring the ‘/usr/bin/’
> directory and installing the programs into the correct location.
Actually, I'm not sure the patch is the right one. My doubts come from
the fact that postgresql binar
package pgtap
tags 568106 + patch
thanks
The attached patch addresses this bug, by declaring the ‘/usr/bin/’
directory and installing the programs into the correct location.
--
\“The World is not dangerous because of those who do harm but |
`\ because of those who look at it
Package: pgtap
Version: 0.23-1
Severity: serious
pg_prove and pg_tapgen belong in /usr/bin/. I don't see any reason to hide
them in a nonstandard directory.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists
11 matches
Mail list logo
