On 10/24/2010 11:55 AM, Pavan Balaji wrote:
On 10/24/2010 11:42 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 23/10/10 at 12:51 -0500, Pavan Balaji wrote:
On 10/23/2010 12:40 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 11/11/09 at 10:15 -0600, Pavan Balaji wrote:
We had a short discussion on this within the MPICH group. We
On 10/24/2010 11:42 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 23/10/10 at 12:51 -0500, Pavan Balaji wrote:
On 10/23/2010 12:40 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 11/11/09 at 10:15 -0600, Pavan Balaji wrote:
We had a short discussion on this within the MPICH group. We believe
that we will be able to modify the c
On 23/10/10 at 12:51 -0500, Pavan Balaji wrote:
>
> On 10/23/2010 12:40 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> >On 11/11/09 at 10:15 -0600, Pavan Balaji wrote:
> >>We had a short discussion on this within the MPICH group. We believe
> >>that we will be able to modify the code such that enabling it at
> >>con
On 10/23/2010 12:40 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 11/11/09 at 10:15 -0600, Pavan Balaji wrote:
We had a short discussion on this within the MPICH group. We believe
that we will be able to modify the code such that enabling it at
configure time should not add any additional performance overhead
f
On 11/11/09 at 10:15 -0600, Pavan Balaji wrote:
>
> We had a short discussion on this within the MPICH group. We believe
> that we will be able to modify the code such that enabling it at
> configure time should not add any additional performance overhead
> for applications that don't need this su
tags 555714 - patch
thanks
On 11/11/09 at 10:15 -0600, Pavan Balaji wrote:
>
> We had a short discussion on this within the MPICH group. We believe
> that we will be able to modify the code such that enabling it at
> configure time should not add any additional performance overhead
> for applicat
We had a short discussion on this within the MPICH group. We believe
that we will be able to modify the code such that enabling it at
configure time should not add any additional performance overhead for
applications that don't need this support. So starting mpich2-1.3, you
should be able
Ok, that makes sense to wait for 1.3.x then I guess. I also forgot in
my patch to point out that BLCR only exists in Debian for i386, amd64,
armel and powerpc.
The patch I submitted for OpenMPI which enabled BLCR support did
indeed add an extra binary package, openmpi-checkpoint which avoids
linki
On 11/11/2009 06:08 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> Since BLCR is now in the archive it would be nice if mpich2 was built
>> using this library to provide checkpoint support. The attached patch
>> enables this at configure time.
Ooh, I'd not recommend that for two reasons:
1. BLCR support is expe
Hi Pavan,
Are there any implications I should be aware of?
L.
On 11/11/09 at 11:08 +, Alan Woodland wrote:
> Package: mpich2
> Version: 1.2-2
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
> Hi,
>
> Since BLCR is now in the archive it would be nice if mpich2 was built
> using this library to provid
Package: mpich2
Version: 1.2-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
Since BLCR is now in the archive it would be nice if mpich2 was built
using this library to provide checkpoint support. The attached patch
enables this at configure time.
Thanks,
Alan
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.
11 matches
Mail list logo
