Hi,
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:04:48AM +0100, Felix Botner wrote:
> i am not sure if this is the right place to for this request,
No, it's not. (The same as #555026 should not have been filed in the first
place, but anyway)
> but i have a similar problem building openoffice 1:3.2.0~rc5-2 (and
>
Hello,
Hello Rene,
i am not sure if this is the right place to for this request,
but i have a similar problem building openoffice 1:3.2.0~rc5-2 (and 1:3.2.0-1)
on a debian/lenny based i386 system (with some squeeze backports, the
openoffice 1:3.2.0~rc3-1 build worked fine).
The problem is tha
reopen 555026
close 555026 1:3.2.0~beta1-2
thanks
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 04:22:27PM +0200, alex bodnaru wrote:
> >>> could you run a build for others too?
> >> You have to wait up to the build server are ready.
> >
> > The problem is that i386 fails to build really and reproduceable :-(
> > (Hel
Hello
alex bodnaru schrieb:
> Package: openoffice.org
> Version: 1:3.1.1-6
> Severity: minor
>
>
> hello rene, friends,
>
> i've got acustomed to check for latest version in experimental,
> but now i see only the arch independent files here, since the
> arch dependent ones are for amd64 only.
[ you maybe should have Cced him, otherwise he does not see your reply ]
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 02:17:54PM +0100, Mechtilde wrote:
> > i've got acustomed to check for latest version in experimental,
> > but now i see only the arch independent files here, since the
> > arch dependent ones a
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1:3.1.1-6
Severity: minor
hello rene, friends,
i've got acustomed to check for latest version in experimental,
but now i see only the arch independent files here, since the
arch dependent ones are for amd64 only.
could you run a build for others too?
thanks i
6 matches
Mail list logo