Bug#563974: Bug#551034: Newer upstream available

2010-08-28 Thread David Paleino
owner 563974 Roy Marples thanks On Sat, 28 Aug 2010 09:37:35 +0100, Roy Marples wrote: > On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 20:53 +0100, Simon Kelley wrote: > > 3) Close bug #563974 in dhcpcd-dbus changelog. (Check with David Paleino > > that he's happy for us to do that - it's his bug.) > > OK for me to do

Bug#551034: Newer upstream available

2010-08-19 Thread David Paleino
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 08:40:59 +0100, Roy Marples wrote: > On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 20:29 +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote: > > you can lower the build dependencies to from debhelper (>= 7.0.50~) to > > debhelper (>= 7.0.15). this way it will also compile on debian lenny. > > Dropping the dependency now

Bug#551034: Newer upstream available

2010-08-19 Thread Roy Marples
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 20:29 +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote: > you can lower the build dependencies to from debhelper (>= 7.0.50~) to > debhelper (>= 7.0.15). > this way it will also compile on debian lenny. Dropping the dependency now gives this lintian error. dhcpcd5 source: debhelper-overrides

Bug#551034: Newer upstream available

2010-08-16 Thread Johannes Schauer
you can lower the build dependencies to from debhelper (>= 7.0.50~) to debhelper (>= 7.0.15). this way it will also compile on debian lenny. is there any update on the status of this ITP? to make our project run well on debian we urgently need dhcpcd-5 and dhcpcd5-dbus being packaged for it!

Bug#551034: Newer upstream available

2010-06-29 Thread Roy Marples
On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 19:32 +0100, Roy Marples wrote: > Aside from that, I think I've addressed all issues so the only thing > left is to make dhcpcd-3 alternatives friendly which I assume you will do? Any progress here? Thanks Roy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists

Bug#551034: Newer upstream available

2010-06-17 Thread Roy Marples
On 17/06/2010 14:03, Simon Kelley wrote: I still bear the scars from an email I once got from someone who had driven 200 miles to reboot a box which had dropped off the net as a result of an automatic update to dhcpcd. I'm not really seeing how that is relevant to the topic at hand as that sce

Bug#551034: Newer upstream available

2010-06-17 Thread Simon Kelley
Roy Marples wrote: > On 15/06/2010 21:13, Simon Kelley wrote: >> I have the dhcpcd5 package installed and running. It seems to be >> behaving itself and looks like a good start. >> >> Some observations of things that should be looked at. >> >> . The source package should be dhcpcd5, not dhcpcd, sin

Bug#551034: Newer upstream available

2010-06-17 Thread Roy Marples
On 17/06/2010 10:17, Roy Marples wrote: The only valid reason for co-existence so far is that some flags have been removed from the commandline that could be used by other people/programs. dhcpcd-4 shipped with some compat code to handle the transition from dhcpcd-123 to dhcpcd-4, to give both de

Bug#551034: Newer upstream available

2010-06-17 Thread Roy Marples
On 15/06/2010 21:13, Simon Kelley wrote: I have the dhcpcd5 package installed and running. It seems to be behaving itself and looks like a good start. Some observations of things that should be looked at. . The source package should be dhcpcd5, not dhcpcd, since the existing source package is d

Bug#551034: Newer upstream available

2010-06-15 Thread Simon Kelley
Roy Marples wrote: I have the dhcpcd5 package installed and running. It seems to be behaving itself and looks like a good start. Some observations of things that should be looked at. . The source package should be dhcpcd5, not dhcpcd, since the existing source package is dhcpcd . The initscript

Bug#551034: Newer upstream available

2010-06-11 Thread Roy Marples
Resent as it didn't make it to the bug report On 10/06/2010 20:59, Simon Kelley wrote: I'm very much in favour of moving to a dhcpcd5 package. Given my terrible record in getting stuff done on this I'm not going to promise to do it, but I will sponsor uploads if needed, and I'll certainly test t

Bug#551034: Newer upstream available

2010-06-10 Thread Simon Kelley
David Paleino wrote: > On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 08:01:18 +0100, Roy Marples wrote: > >> Hi > > Hello Roy, > >> I'm upstream for dhcpcd and have recently installed Ubuntu on one of my >> machines and as such have a vested interest and now the means of using >> my software on a Debian based system. I h

Bug#551034: Newer upstream available

2010-06-10 Thread Roy Marples
On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 20:59 +0100, Simon Kelley wrote: > I'm very much in favour of moving to a dhcpcd5 package. Given my > terrible record in getting stuff done on this I'm not going to promise > to do it, but I will sponsor uploads if needed, and I'll certainly test > things. > > > Roy, please

Bug#551034: Newer upstream available

2010-06-10 Thread David Paleino
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 08:01:18 +0100, Roy Marples wrote: > Hi Hello Roy, > I'm upstream for dhcpcd and have recently installed Ubuntu on one of my > machines and as such have a vested interest and now the means of using > my software on a Debian based system. I have packages prepared for > dhcpcd,

Bug#551034: Newer upstream available

2010-06-10 Thread Roy Marples
Hi I'm upstream for dhcpcd and have recently installed Ubuntu on one of my machines and as such have a vested interest and now the means of using my software on a Debian based system. I have packages prepared for dhcpcd, dhcpcd-dbus and dhcpcd-gtk already and will work on one for openresolv (resol

Bug#551034: Newer upstream available

2010-01-09 Thread Simon Kelley
David Paleino wrote: block 563974 by 551034 thanks Hello, On Saturday 17 October 2009 11:26:49, Dennis Schridde wrote: Version 5.1.2 was released. I just saw 5.1.4 is available on the website. Simon, I'm packaging dhcpcd-dbus (ITP #563974), and it needs at least 4.99.14 to work. What are y

Bug#551034: Newer upstream available

2010-01-09 Thread David Paleino
block 563974 by 551034 thanks Hello, On Saturday 17 October 2009 11:26:49, Dennis Schridde wrote: > Version 5.1.2 was released. I just saw 5.1.4 is available on the website. Simon, I'm packaging dhcpcd-dbus (ITP #563974), and it needs at least 4.99.14 to work. What are your intentions regardin