On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 08:55:42AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > Why didn't you suggest that when the plan was outlined :)
>
> I did.
Then I must have missed that. Link please?
If you did, maybe we "rejected" it because it's cause temporary
disruption. Not sure.
> > > one, so that it doesn't ma
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 08:57:38AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > But anyways, it's far too late now to change that, you can also
> > live without those Breaks:, but then you'll have trouble with partial
> > updates
> > when the compat symlinks go away...
>
> Why don't you keep the compat sym
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 08:46:41AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 07:45:22AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > The Breaks thing sounds wrong. That should be the other way around. The
> > ones breaking the others are the dictionaries breaking iceape and
> > others, not i
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 08:49:59AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 08:01:03AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > But anyways, why don't we keep the old directory as a symlink to the new
>
> Because the dir is still poplulated by files (well, symlinks) to ease
> partial u
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 08:46:41AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 07:45:22AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > The Breaks thing sounds wrong. That should be the other way around. The
> > ones breaking the others are the dictionaries breaking iceape and
> > others, not iceape bre
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 07:45:22AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> The Breaks thing sounds wrong. That should be the other way around. The
> ones breaking the others are the dictionaries breaking iceape and
> others, not iceape breaking the dictionaries...
I disagree. iceape breaks the old ones b
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 08:01:03AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> But anyways, why don't we keep the old directory as a symlink to the new
Because the dir is still poplulated by files (well, symlinks) to ease
partial upgrades. We can't jus throw them away right now unless wchange
all dicts again
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 07:45:22AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 01:39:45AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Package: iceape
> > Version: 1.1.17-2
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Tags: patch
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > We are now in STEP 2 of the transition of the hunspell dicts (and oth
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 08:01:03AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 07:45:22AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 01:39:45AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > > Package: iceape
> > > Version: 1.1.17-2
> > > Severity: wishlist
> > > Tags: patch
> > >
> > > Hi,
>
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 01:39:45AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Package: iceape
> Version: 1.1.17-2
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
> Hi,
>
> We are now in STEP 2 of the transition of the hunspell dicts (and others not
> relevant to iceape) location transition.
>
> As all dicts now got fi
Package: iceape
Version: 1.1.17-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
We are now in STEP 2 of the transition of the hunspell dicts (and others not
relevant to iceape) location transition.
As all dicts now got fixed (and OOo already got updated, too), please apply
this to make iceape-browser look
11 matches
Mail list logo
