On 2009-09-30 11:06 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Sven Joachim]
>> Any clue why killall5 did not manage to kill it for good?
>
> I would assume the process is unkillable due to some kernel hang.
> killall5 simply call the kill(2) system call to signal processes to
> die.
>
> Your analysis m
[Sven Joachim]
> Any clue why killall5 did not manage to kill it for good?
I would assume the process is unkillable due to some kernel hang.
killall5 simply call the kill(2) system call to signal processes to
die.
Your analysis make me believe sendsigs is correct, and the problem is
between the k
2 matches
Mail list logo
