Hi,
At Fri, 11 Sep 2009 13:47:04 -0500,
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 11 2009, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
>
> > Junichi Uekawa a écrit :
> >> You probably want to really fix these packages.
>
> > I don't have a strong opinion on what should be fixed.
>
> > Manoj, what's your opinion on t
On Fri, Sep 11 2009, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Junichi Uekawa a écrit :
>> You probably want to really fix these packages.
> I don't have a strong opinion on what should be fixed.
> Manoj, what's your opinion on this?
I've fixed _my_ packages, but the current qemubuilder setup is
still
Junichi Uekawa a écrit :
> You probably want to really fix these packages.
I don't have a strong opinion on what should be fixed.
Manoj, what's your opinion on this?
Cheers,
--
Stéphane
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 23:04:06 +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Hmmm... I'm not quite sure if it's a good idea, but the problem sounds
> genuine.
>
> However, is this specific to qemubuilder ? For example, that means
> packages don't work if you try work in recovery mode with kernel
>
Hi,
Hmmm... I'm not quite sure if it's a good idea, but the problem sounds
genuine.
However, is this specific to qemubuilder ? For example, that means
packages don't work if you try work in recovery mode with kernel
booting with init=/bin/sh.
You probably want to really fix these packages.
A
Package: qemubuilder
Version: 0.56+a1
Severity: normal
Hello,
qemubuilder should install a diversion of /sbin/telinit to some dummy
script to avoid bugs like #544571, #537888, #543347 or #543344.
Cheers,
--
Stéphane
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
AP
6 matches
Mail list logo
