Bug#544857: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#544857: xfce4-utils: xflock4 can be improved

2009-09-03 Thread Luca Niccoli
2009/9/3 Yves-Alexis Perez : > On jeu, 2009-09-03 at 13:15 +0200, Luca Niccoli wrote: >> As it is now, xflock4 doesn't check for the presence of xlock, which isn't >> guaranteed to be present on the system. > > Yeah, it's not really grave to be honest. What if it fails? It's the > last one anyway :

Bug#544857: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#544857: xfce4-utils: xflock4 can be improved

2009-09-03 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On jeu, 2009-09-03 at 13:15 +0200, Luca Niccoli wrote: > As it is now, xflock4 doesn't check for the presence of xlock, which isn't > guaranteed to be present on the system. Yeah, it's not really grave to be honest. What if it fails? It's the last one anyway :) > I would be nice if it would try t

Bug#544857: xfce4-utils: xflock4 can be improved

2009-09-03 Thread Luca Niccoli
Package: xfce4-utils Version: 4.6.1-1 Severity: minor Tags: patch -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 As it is now, xflock4 doesn't check for the presence of xlock, which isn't guaranteed to be present on the system. I would be nice if it would try to use xtrclock as well. Patch attach