Bug#543512: update-fonts-alias should skip removed fonts

2009-12-26 Thread Julien Cristau
Hi Joey, On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 14:10:01 -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote: > > The latter choice would be too complicated if the font package ships more > > than one alias file. So, I take the former. > > > > debhelper patch looks cleaner, and I hope the added options

Bug#543512: update-fonts-alias should skip removed fonts

2009-12-09 Thread Julien Cristau
tag 543512 pending kthxbye On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 13:04:41 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > With those changes I think this is ready. > Pushed: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-xorg/font/xfonts-utils.git;a=commit;h=6c9954c869ef8960790cfcb63a30200c0390689f Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#543512: update-fonts-alias should skip removed fonts

2009-12-09 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 17:18:49 +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote: > On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 02:04:01AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > I think I've fixed this, I put a package up for testing at > > http://people.debian.org/~jcristau/xfonts-utils_7.5+1~thep1.dsc > > I haven't tested that th

Bug#543512: update-fonts-alias should skip removed fonts

2009-12-09 Thread Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 02:04:01AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > I think I've fixed this, I put a package up for testing at > http://people.debian.org/~jcristau/xfonts-utils_7.5+1~thep1.dsc > I haven't tested that this works properly, and I don't know when I can > do that, so any help would be wel

Bug#543512: update-fonts-alias should skip removed fonts

2009-12-02 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 22:21:08 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > Your patch makes us ship /var/lib/xfonts/excluded-aliases in the > package, so AFAICT it will replace the local version on each > xfonts-utils upgrade, which is not what we want. I'll change this to > create the file in postinst if i

Bug#543512: update-fonts-alias should skip removed fonts

2009-10-28 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 09:54:06 +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote: > On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 5:27 AM, Julien Cristau wrote: > > ... and now I wonder if the foo.alias files really need to stay in /etc, > > or if we can move them somewhere else where they'll be removed with the > > correspond

Bug#543512: update-fonts-alias should skip removed fonts

2009-10-16 Thread Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 5:27 AM, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sat, Sep  5, 2009 at 11:00:54 +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote: > >> +INCLUDE_ALIAS= >> +EXCLUDE_ALIAS= >> +EXCLUDE_CONF=/etc/fonts/excluded-aliases > > Should this one be somewhere in /etc/X11 instead?  /etc/fonts has the > fontcon

Bug#543512: update-fonts-alias should skip removed fonts

2009-10-16 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 11:00:54 +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote: > Index: xfonts-utils-7.4+2.1/debian/local/update-fonts-alias > === > --- xfonts-utils-7.4+2.1.orig/debian/local/update-fonts-alias 2009-09-02 > 22:11:23.00

Bug#543512: update-fonts-alias should skip removed fonts

2009-09-07 Thread Joey Hess
Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote: > The latter choice would be too complicated if the font package ships more > than one alias file. So, I take the former. > > debhelper patch looks cleaner, and I hope the added options are OK for > xfonts-utils. This patch is fine by me for debhelper; of course

Bug#543512: update-fonts-alias should skip removed fonts

2009-09-04 Thread Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 02:42:08PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote: > > + push @alias_postinst, "\tsed -i > > \',/etc/X11/fonts/$f/$package.alias,d\' $alias_exclude"; > > + push @alias_postrm, "\tsed -i > > \'\\

Bug#543512: update-fonts-alias should skip removed fonts

2009-09-02 Thread Joey Hess
Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote: > + push @alias_postinst, "\tsed -i > \',/etc/X11/fonts/$f/$package.alias,d\' $alias_exclude"; > + push @alias_postrm, "\tsed -i > \',/etc/X11/fonts/$f/$package.alias,d\' $alias_exclude"; I h

Bug#543512: update-fonts-alias should skip removed fonts

2009-09-02 Thread Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 12:16:02AM +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote: > Exclude list, probably: > > - /etc/fonts/excluded-aliases lists *.alias files to be excluded. > - Patch update-fonts-alias to filter out the exclude list. > - Patch dh_installxfonts so that: > - package.postrm adds its

Bug#543512: update-fonts-alias should skip removed fonts

2009-08-27 Thread Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: > update-fonts-* shouldn't need to know about dpkg, IMO.  Any way we can > avoid this? Exclude list, probably: - /etc/fonts/excluded-aliases lists *.alias files to be excluded. - Patch update-fonts-alias to filter out the exclude list. - Pa

Bug#543512: update-fonts-alias should skip removed fonts

2009-08-27 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 22:43:44 +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote: > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 05:13:52PM +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:55:04PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > > Alternatively, have it take a list of the font files that are > > > going to be

Bug#543512: update-fonts-alias should skip removed fonts

2009-08-27 Thread Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
tags 543512 + patch thanks On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 05:13:52PM +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:55:04PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > Alternatively, have it take a list of the font files that are > > going to be removed, and update the file to remove them; then it