Bug#543271: udev rules

2009-10-25 Thread Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 05:03:02PM +0200, "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" wrote: > Bartosz, do you have some time to look at it ? > If not, I'll try to work on the issue during this week end, however I'm > not sure I'll find the time to do so. I've got some spare time right now and I'm starting to work

Bug#543271: Bug #543271: udev rules

2009-10-23 Thread Simon McVittie
tags 543271 + patch thanks I can confirm that Matthias' patch (which is tiny and obvious) is sufficient to solve the immediate problem of /dev/fuse being owned by root:root. It's a sufficiently annoying bug, with a sufficiently trivial fix, that I'd be happy to NMU this if you're too busy... I ha

Bug#543271: udev rules

2009-10-22 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
Hi, Bartosz, do you have some time to look at it ? If not, I'll try to work on the issue during this week end, however I'm not sure I'll find the time to do so. Regards, Adam. Raphael Geissert a écrit : Hi Bartosz, Adam, Could you please care a bit more about the package and fix this annoyi

Bug#543271: udev rules

2009-10-22 Thread Raphael Geissert
Hi Bartosz, Adam, Could you please care a bit more about the package and fix this annoying bug? It's been two months and there has been no single message from either of you regarding this issue. Regards, -- Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer www.debian.org - get.debian.net -- To UNSUBSCRIB

Bug#543271: udev rules

2009-08-23 Thread Marco d'Itri
Package: fuse-utils Version: 2.7.4-2 Severity: important I am forced to remove from the udev package the rules referencing non-standard groups, so you will have to either use the new ConsoleKit framework to set ACLs or ship a rules file with this content: KERNEL=="fuse", GROUP="fuse" Please also