Adrian Perez wrote:
> You don't need to do the extra steps (although they don't hurt
> at all), you need to investigate is your JAVA_HOME is
> persistant, then who's setting it. Check your ~/.bash* files,
> /etc/bash.bashrc, the like, you know.
Yes!! It was set in /etc/profile. I must have put it
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 21:47 +0200, Jan Willem Stumpel wrote:
> JAVA_HOME is set, to /usr/lib/java. I do not know where this is
> set. JAVA_CMD is not normally set.
That's exactly what is causing the script to fail. It's using your
provided JAVA_HOME which is set to /usr/lib/java. Then, according
Adrian Perez wrote:
> I think we both agree the problem is related to your
> environment and not the packaging.
That's very likely.
> It seems the java-wrapper script it's not finding your java
> runtime, which may be caused by a wrong environment
> configuration. Make sure you have no environmen
I think we both agree the problem is related to your environment and not
the packaging.
It seems the java-wrapper script it's not finding your java runtime,
which may be caused by a wrong environment configuration.
Make sure you have no environment variables like JAVA_HOME or JAVA_CMD
set, since
Adrian Perez wrote:
> tag + unreproducible moreinfo
> Well, I've tested it on openjdk, otherwise I wouldn't released it.
> I've attached the output from my machine, after update-java-alternatives
> --set java-6-openjdk and it's working fine.
> I think it's something wrong with your installation. As
Sorry about the typo. I have tested in chroot too. it doesn't seem to
happen. Waiting for your log output.
tags 542392 + unreproducible moreinfo
severity 542392 important
--
Best regards,
Adrian Perez
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
tag + unreproducible moreinfo
Well, I've tested it on openjdk, otherwise I wouldn't released it.
I've attached the output from my machine, after update-java-alternatives
--set java-6-openjdk and it's working fine.
I think it's something wrong with your installation. As Onkar pointed
please provide
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Jan Willem Stumpel wrote:
> Package: azureus
> Version: 4.2.0.4-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> I have openjdk-6-jre installed, because azureus used to depend on it.
> openjdk works fine with other java applications as well, so no
>
Package: azureus
Version: 4.2.0.4-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I have openjdk-6-jre installed, because azureus used to depend on it.
openjdk works fine with other java applications as well, so no
complaints here. But (see bug report #515015) some users found it annoyin
9 matches
Mail list logo
