On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 01:04:31PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Because I have misread the rules file when I quickly skimmed through
> it to see what was supposed to be in the header. I thought this line
> ...
Thanks for the clarification. I wasn't sure if I missed something.
Michael
--
[Michael Meskes]
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 09:54:42PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > implies $local_fs. I suspect the original setup for this service will
> > fail if runlevel 1 is used (daemon killed by sendsigs, but not started
> > when switching to other runlevel). But that is a differe
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 09:54:42PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> implies $local_fs. I suspect the original setup for this service will
> fail if runlevel 1 is used (daemon killed by sendsigs, but not started
> when switching to other runlevel). But that is a different problem
I don't reall
Package: quota
Version: 3.13-11
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: initscripts-ng-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: incorrect-runlevels incorrect-dependency
With dependency based boot sequencing, I discovered what I believe is
a bug in the init.d script. The list of runlevels i
4 matches
Mail list logo
