Hello,
On antradienis 18 Rugpjūtis 2009 23:17:45 Joey Hess wrote:
> أحمد المحمودي wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 03:13:18PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > So I don't think that making dh_auto_install behave as you request
> > > is a good idea, because having it install directly into
> > > debia
أحمد المحمودي wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 03:13:18PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > So I don't think that making dh_auto_install behave as you request
> > is a good idea, because having it install directly into debian/
> > would eliminate the ability to handle any of those three cases via
> > dh_
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 03:13:18PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> So I don't think that making dh_auto_install behave as you request
> is a good idea, because having it install directly into debian/
> would eliminate the ability to handle any of those three cases via
> dh_install configuration.
---end q
أحمد المحمودي wrote:
> My case is like this, I got an upstream tarball with 2 subdirs,
> each subdir has its setup.py, and each of those subdirs should be
> installed in a separate binary package.
>
> So, in debian/rules I would do:
>
> override_dh_auto_install:
> dh_auto_install --so
Package: debhelper
Version: 7.3.6
Severity: normal
Hello,
My case is like this, I got an upstream tarball with 2 subdirs,
each subdir has its setup.py, and each of those subdirs should be
installed in a separate binary package.
So, in debian/rules I would do:
override_dh_auto_install:
5 matches
Mail list logo
