Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> The wrapper needs to run
>
> cups \
> -o Dir::Etc::sourcelist=/etc/apt/$ARCH/sources.list \
> -o Dir::Etc::sourceparts=/etc/apt/$ARCH/sources.list.d \
> -o Dir::State=$LISTDIR/$ARCH \
> -o Dir::Cache=/var/cache/apt/$ARCH \
> -o Apt::Arc
"Eugene V. Lyubimkin" writes:
>> Cupt will need a wrapper so "cupt update" works right. The wrapper
>> could also set the option to ignore signature checks other than when
>> downloading. So that would work.
>>
>> Does cupt have an equivalent to
>>
>> apt-get.real --no-list-cleanup --no-downloa
package cupt
severity 533753 serious
thanks
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> But if the file is there then apt-get/aptitude will consider it good
> without checking. So
>
> cupt update
> apt-get install
>
> would install packages even if the signature is bad.
>
> Not a good idea. Can't you downloa
"Eugene V. Lyubimkin" writes:
> Goswin Brederlow wrote:
>> Package: cupt
>> Version: 0.2.2
>> Severity: normal
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> for ia32-apt-get to work it has to do some magic with the Index files
>> apt-get downloads. This means mangling them after they have been
>> downloaded and signatures c
Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> Package: cupt
> Version: 0.2.2
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> for ia32-apt-get to work it has to do some magic with the Index files
> apt-get downloads. This means mangling them after they have been
> downloaded and signatures checked. This is fine in apt-get as it does
Package: cupt
Version: 0.2.2
Severity: normal
Hi,
for ia32-apt-get to work it has to do some magic with the Index files
apt-get downloads. This means mangling them after they have been
downloaded and signatures checked. This is fine in apt-get as it does
not check the signature again, only on dow
6 matches
Mail list logo
