Hi! I read the exim4 manual on SPF [1] and tried the example on my
Debian buster server (even tried 4.94 from buster-backports) but
discovered that exim4 wasn't built with libspf2 support, and stumbled
on this old bug report.
Is there today any reason exim4-daemon-heavy isn't built with libspf2
s
Package: exim4-daemon-heavy
Followup-For: Bug #528344
As of Exim 4.91 SPF is no longer marked experimental. Therefore, I see
no reason why it can't be enabled.
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2009-05-12 Micha Lenk wrote:
>> I would like to have the exim4-daemon-heavy compiled with the native SPF
>> support enabled, like it is documented here:
>> http://wiki.exim.org/SPF
>
> I thought SPF would probably fall out of favour, due to DKIM.
Neverthe
On 2009-05-12 Micha Lenk wrote:
> Package: exim4-daemon-heavy
> Version: 4.63-17
> Severity: wishlist
> Hi,
> Thanks a lot for taking care of Exim in Debian.
> I would like to have the exim4-daemon-heavy compiled with the native SPF
> support enabled, like it is documented here:
> http://wiki.e
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 11:57:48AM +0200, Micha Lenk wrote:
> Package: exim4-daemon-heavy
> Version: 4.63-17
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks a lot for taking care of Exim in Debian.
>
> I would like to have the exim4-daemon-heavy compiled with the native SPF
> support enabled, like it is
Package: exim4-daemon-heavy
Version: 4.63-17
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
Thanks a lot for taking care of Exim in Debian.
I would like to have the exim4-daemon-heavy compiled with the native SPF
support enabled, like it is documented here:
http://wiki.exim.org/SPF
Regards
Micha
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
6 matches
Mail list logo
