Hi,
Ben Finney wrote:
> Attached is an updated patch bundle taking the above into account.
Applied in the 3.1 branch.
(came too late for 3.0.1-8...)
Manual, though, because:
19:40 < _rene_> jelmer: ping?
19:40 < _rene_> jelmer: how do I upgrade the remote copy on bzr.d.o to the
"new" format?
1
On 24-Mar-2009, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Ben Finney wrote:
> > -Description: Legacy filters (e.g. StarOffice 5.2) for OpenOffice.org
> > +Description: full-featured office productivity suite -- legacy filters
>
> I think we should leave the SO 5.2 mentioning there. [… reason …]
That sounds like a
Hi,
Ben Finney wrote:
> Attached is an updated patch bundle addressing this bug which takes
> your suggested categorisations into account.
{...}
> @@ -741,7 +741,7 @@
> openoffice.org-filter-so52
> Provides: openoffice.org2-filter-so52, openoffice.org-filter-so52
> Conflicts: openoffice.org2
On 22-Mar-2009, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> I'll give you a list of packages and what they belong to instead.
Attached is an updated patch bundle addressing this bug which takes
your suggested categorisations into account.
--
\ “Imagine a world without hypothetical situations.” —anonymous |
On 22-Mar-2009, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> I'll give you a list of packages and what they belong to instead.
[…]
Thanks. I will work on a new patch for the package synopses based on
this information.
--
\“If you go to a costume party at your boss's house, wouldn't |
`\ you think a go
Hi,
Ben Finney wrote:
> On 21-Mar-2009, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Why should we be not allowed ro refer to Openoffice.org in the
> > deescription, It's well known.
>
> The reasoning is in the Developer's Reference: the tools that will
> display the synopsis already display the package name, so th
On 21-Mar-2009, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Why should we be not allowed ro refer to Openoffice.org in the
> deescription, It's well known.
The reasoning is in the Developer's Reference: the tools that will
display the synopsis already display the package name, so the synopsis
should use its limited s
tag 520611 - patch
thnks
Ben Finney wrote:
> --- control.debug.in 2009-03-20 19:33:13 +
> +++ control.debug.in 2009-03-21 10:25:37 +
> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
> Priority: extra
> Depends: ${misc:Depends}
> Suggests: ${dbg-dbg-suggests}
> -Description: OpenOffice.org debug symbols
> +Descripti
tags 520611 + patch
thanks
The attached patch bundle addresses this, by unifying each of the
OpenOffice.org packages with a descriptive synopsis that does not
repeat the name “OpenOffice.org”.
--
\ “I must say that I find television very educational. The minute |
`\ somebody turns i
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1:3.0.1-7
Severity: normal
As the Developer's Reference advises, the package synopsis should not
repeat the name of the package
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-binary.html#s-synopsis>.
Lintian reports an error:
E: description-starts-with-package-nam
10 matches
Mail list logo
