On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 02:40:32PM -0700, Scott Ritchie wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 12:50:48PM -0700, Scott Ritchie wrote:
> >> We now have libao in ia32-libs on Ubuntu, so it definitely should be
> >> removed from packages-arch-specific. Debian could do something simil
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 12:50:48PM -0700, Scott Ritchie wrote:
>> We now have libao in ia32-libs on Ubuntu, so it definitely should be
>> removed from packages-arch-specific. Debian could do something similar.
>>
>> I'm still not exactly sure how to get the package to configur
On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 12:50:48PM -0700, Scott Ritchie wrote:
> We now have libao in ia32-libs on Ubuntu, so it definitely should be
> removed from packages-arch-specific. Debian could do something similar.
>
> I'm still not exactly sure how to get the package to configure properly
> though -- i
We now have libao in ia32-libs on Ubuntu, so it definitely should be
removed from packages-arch-specific. Debian could do something similar.
I'm still not exactly sure how to get the package to configure properly
though -- it seems as though configure prefers to look in /usr/lib
instead of /usr/l
4 matches
Mail list logo