On 10.06.2010 21:05, Arnaud Patard (Rtp) wrote:
Matthias Klose writes:
so what do you propose?
- drop mips as a release architecture?
- do you volunteer to make gcc-4.5 ready for inclusion
in mips and fix any resulting RC-critical issue?
I'm no gcc or binutils hacker. I've reported w
Matthias Klose writes:
> On 09.06.2010 12:02, Arnaud Patard (Rtp) wrote:
>> Matthias Klose writes:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> On 08.06.2010 20:02, Bdale Garbee wrote:
This prevents dump from building on mips/mipsel, which means the version
of dump in testing is now months out of date.
On 09.06.2010 12:02, Arnaud Patard (Rtp) wrote:
Matthias Klose writes:
Hi,
On 08.06.2010 20:02, Bdale Garbee wrote:
This prevents dump from building on mips/mipsel, which means the version
of dump in testing is now months out of date.
Is there an estimate for when this bug will be fixed?
Matthias Klose writes:
Hi,
> On 08.06.2010 20:02, Bdale Garbee wrote:
>> This prevents dump from building on mips/mipsel, which means the version
>> of dump in testing is now months out of date.
>>
>> Is there an estimate for when this bug will be fixed?
>
> this is up to the debian-mips maintai
On 08.06.2010 20:02, Bdale Garbee wrote:
This prevents dump from building on mips/mipsel, which means the version
of dump in testing is now months out of date.
Is there an estimate for when this bug will be fixed?
this is up to the debian-mips maintainers to answer.
is there different behavio
This prevents dump from building on mips/mipsel, which means the version
of dump in testing is now months out of date.
Is there an estimate for when this bug will be fixed?
Bdale
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
6 matches
Mail list logo
