On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> the fsync() based approach - when it works - would give the following
> advantage: either the new records or the old records file is there. Thus at
> maximum one interval of uptime is lost. With checking sanity of
> configuration file ev
the fsync() based approach - when it works - would give the following
advantage: either the new records or the old records file is there. Thus at
maximum one interval of uptime is lost. With checking sanity of
configuration file everything since the last backup from uptimed is lost,
which might
2 matches
Mail list logo
