On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Mark Poks wrote:
> >Mark, does the issue still manifest itself with more recent kernel
> >versions?
> >
> >Cheers,
> > Moritz
>
> when i reduced memory speed from 800 to 667 MHz it seem to not suspending
> any longer. maybe it's hardware fault in fact?
>
> b
when i reduced memory speed from 800 to 667 MHz it seem to not suspending
any longer. maybe it's hardware fault in fact?
but i have just updated my kernel today, raised memory speed to 800 MHz
again and i will try to suspend my machine and report my observations in few
days.
cheers,
Mark
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:07:23AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 08:13:45PM +0100, Mark Poks wrote:
> > i am not sure what exacly causes the problem. it maight be cpufreq, or
> > kernel
> > or maybe something else (or CPU Frequency Scalling Monitor applet in GNOME
> > whic
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 08:13:45PM +0100, Mark Poks wrote:
> i am not sure what exacly causes the problem. it maight be cpufreq, or kernel
> or maybe something else (or CPU Frequency Scalling Monitor applet in GNOME
> which is rather in doubt).
>
> when enabled "AMD Quiet'n'cool" in BIOS (the CPU
reassign 515125 linux-2.6
thanks
Hi,
Thank you for your bug report.
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 08:13:45PM +0100, Mark Poks wrote:
> i am not sure what exacly causes the problem. it maight be cpufreq,
> or kernel or maybe something else (or CPU Frequency Scalling Monitor
> applet in GNOME which is
Package: general
Severity: important
i am not sure what exacly causes the problem. it maight be cpufreq, or kernel
or maybe something else (or CPU Frequency Scalling Monitor applet in GNOME
which is rather in doubt).
when enabled "AMD Quiet'n'cool" in BIOS (the CPU frequency scalling) and have
in
6 matches
Mail list logo
