On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 10:08 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> martin f krafft wrote, Wednesday, February 11, 2009 9:21 AM
> > I suggest to also include the fix to --bpo. I'll gladly review the diff.
>
> I've already uploaded the version that Marc approved. I can prepare a
> further update if desire
martin f krafft wrote, Wednesday, February 11, 2009 9:21 AM
also sprach Adam D. Barratt [2009.02.11.0858
+0100]:
Should the RT be happy to accept it, I've attached a diff that adds
those two distributions to the list. (On a side note, --bpo will still
create an etch-backports upload, but I have
Philipp Kern wrote, Wednesday, February 11, 2009 9:50 AM
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 09:27:16AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Please upload.
Apart from the fact that devscripts might be something for volatile,
I don't think we have time to include this arch-specific upload. It can
surely b
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 09:27:16AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> "Adam D. Barratt" writes:
> > On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 08:08 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> >> also sprach Adam D. Barratt [2009.02.11.0800
> >> +0100]:
> >> Please do. Having a devscripts in lenny whose dch is not aware of
also sprach Adam D. Barratt [2009.02.11.0858 +0100]:
> Should the RT be happy to accept it, I've attached a diff that adds
> those two distributions to the list. (On a side note, --bpo will still
> create an etch-backports upload, but I haven't changed that in order to
> keep the diff minimal and
"Adam D. Barratt" writes:
> On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 08:08 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
>> also sprach Adam D. Barratt [2009.02.11.0800
>> +0100]:
>> Please do. Having a devscripts in lenny whose dch is not aware of
>> lenny-* (of which lenny-volatile is official and lenny-backports
>> almost so)
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 08:08 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Adam D. Barratt [2009.02.11.0800
> +0100]:
> > > If this also applies to the lenny version, this bug should be
> > > made RC!
> >
> > It does (I'm assuming there'll also be a lenny-volatile in the not
> > too distant future)
severity 514818 serious
thanks
also sprach Adam D. Barratt [2009.02.11.0800 +0100]:
> > If this also applies to the lenny version, this bug should be
> > made RC!
>
> It does (I'm assuming there'll also be a lenny-volatile in the not
> too distant future).
>
> If the release team would be happy
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 07:35 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> dch warning: Recognised distributions are: unstable, testing, stable,
> oldstable, experimental, UNRELEASED, {sarge,etch}-{volatile,backports},
> {oldstable-,testing-,}proposed-updates and
> {testing,stable,oldstable}-security.
>
>
> If
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.10.45
Severity: normal
dch warning: Recognised distributions are: unstable, testing, stable,
oldstable, experimental, UNRELEASED, {sarge,etch}-{volatile,backports},
{oldstable-,testing-,}proposed-updates and {testing,stable,oldstable}-security.
If this also applies
10 matches
Mail list logo
