On 12:42 Sun 01 Mar 2009, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Sonntag, 1. März 2009, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > I've already droped in rules to deal with this; the previous ones
> > hadn't taken effect due to a warning that I didn't catch.
>
> Thanks.
>
> > It doesn't really matter to me what you folks decid
On Sonntag, 1. März 2009, Holger Levsen wrote:
> new backscatter (new languages, new wordings) which is something which can
> hardled without redesigning email and people, thats why I think we will go
I ment: ...which is something which cannot be handled...
signature.asc
Description: This is a d
Hi Don,
On Sonntag, 1. März 2009, Don Armstrong wrote:
> I've already droped in rules to deal with this; the previous ones
> hadn't taken effect due to a warning that I didn't catch.
Thanks.
> It doesn't really matter to me what you folks decide, but since you
> decided as a group not to do mode
On Sun, 01 Mar 2009, Holger Levsen wrote:
> They seem not really to be willing to give us moderation as
> requested in #514039 so I'll have to waste my time reporting
> backscatter, which is what they want. (I dont get why they dont
> listen to their users but instead ask them to suffer backscatter
Hi,
I've discussed today on IRC with the debian listmasters (actually one) about
the recent increase in volume of backscatter on the debian-edu list.
They seem not really to be willing to give us moderation as requested in
#514039 so I'll have to waste my time reporting backscatter, which is wh
5 matches
Mail list logo