On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 01:17:15PM +, Neil McGovern a écrit :
Changing to a new version of a build system really isn't something
that's garunteed to be 100% trouble free. Your other packages will have
had more than a month, and I'd like to shin in
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
As I understand it the best gain this change in the debhelper
compatibility level at this point could bring us, is that the package
builds just as well as with the existing level. So why did you do that now
instead of after the freeze?
Well, there is
On Tue, January 27, 2009 14:55, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I was thinking that changes like the one I made would be accepted until
> "Deep freeze", since this is the only planned change of unblock policy
> that was announced:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2008/12/msg6.html
Perha
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 08:56:29PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 11:36:54AM +, Neil McGovern a écrit :
> > On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 07:53:53PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> >
> > The debhelper change, at this very very late stage in the release. Your
> > previous reque
Le Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 11:36:54AM +, Neil McGovern a écrit :
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 07:53:53PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
> The debhelper change, at this very very late stage in the release. Your
> previous request was about a month and a half ago.
Is there a precise concern? Some pro
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 07:53:53PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Hi Neil, thanks for your review.
>
> Le Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:45:30AM +, Neil McGovern a écrit :
> >
> > > >* Use Debhelper 7 (idebian/co{ntrol,mpat}.
> >
> > Not ok.
>
> What's wrong, Debhelper or the typo? Most freeze
Hi Neil, thanks for your review.
Le Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:45:30AM +, Neil McGovern a écrit :
>
> > >* Use Debhelper 7 (idebian/co{ntrol,mpat}.
>
> Not ok.
What's wrong, Debhelper or the typo? Most freeze exemptions I got so far (from
other release managers) included a Debhelper update
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 07:09:31PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> http://people.debian.org/~naoliv/misc/debian-med/biofox_diff.txt
>
> >* New upstream release, compatible with Firefox 3 (Closes: #512371).
> >* Updated debian/watch.
Both ok.
> >* Use Debhelper 7 (idebian/co{ntrol,mpat
Dear release team,
bioFOX 1.1.4 was so old that it did not work with Firefox 3. I updated it to
1.1.5 in Sid; we missed this release as Upstream changed the location of its
uploads.
bioFOX is a mozilla extension that contains most of its files in a .jar, so a
debdiff would not be very informative
9 matches
Mail list logo
