Bug#508857: libpurple0: bad handling of prefs after reinitialization

2009-02-03 Thread Ludovico Cavedon
FYI, the bugfix was not released with milestone 2.5.4, but will be with version 2.5.5. Thanks, Ludovico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#508857: libpurple0: bad handling of prefs after reinitialization

2009-01-02 Thread Ludovico Cavedon
Applied upstream http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=508857 Regards, Ludovico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#508857: libpurple0: bad handling of prefs after reinitialization

2008-12-20 Thread Ludovico Cavedon
Hi, Ari Pollak wrote: > FWIW, I have no plans to apply these patches independently of upstream, > especially before lenny gets released. The useful patch is only one http://developer.pidgin.im/attachment/ticket/7761/nullptr-noleak.patch there others are win32 patches. Moreover it would be useful

Bug#508857: libpurple0: bad handling of prefs after reinitialization

2008-12-15 Thread Ari Pollak
forwarded 508857 http://developer.pidgin.im/ticket/7761 thanks FWIW, I have no plans to apply these patches independently of upstream, especially before lenny gets released. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

Bug#508857: libpurple0: bad handling of prefs after reinitialization

2008-12-15 Thread Ludovico Cavedon
Package: libpurple0 Version: 2.5.2-1 Severity: normal Tags: patch upstream If the prefs code of libpurple is re-initialized (e.g. by calling purple_prefs_uninit() and than purple_prefs_init()), the prefs data structure is not re-initialized properly. This bug has already been reported upstream at