Bug#506809: oolite: new upstream release (1.73)

2010-08-19 Thread Stephen Kitt
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 05:22:15PM +0200, Nicolas Boulenguez wrote: > Active in Debian or not, an human will usually answer to a patch or > request. Eddy answered to me many times with kind advices. Inside a > huge team, like DGT with 134 members and 288 packages, everyone > focuses on his own in

Bug#506809: oolite: new upstream release (1.73)

2010-08-19 Thread Nicolas Boulenguez
Hello. Active in Debian or not, an human will usually answer to a patch or request. Eddy answered to me many times with kind advices. Inside a huge team, like DGT with 134 members and 288 packages, everyone focuses on his own interests, it becomes easyer for a specific message to be ignored. I r

Bug#506809: oolite: new upstream release (1.73)

2010-08-19 Thread Eddy Petrișor
2010/8/17 Ludovic Brenta : > tags 506809 pending > thanks > > > I'm about to sponsor the package by Nicolas Boulenguez (1.74.2) into > unstable.  I have already built the package and am testing it.  Before I > upload, I have a pair of questions.  From the debian/control in the > proposed new versio

Bug#506809: oolite: new upstream release (1.73)

2010-08-18 Thread Stephen Kitt
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 09:46:19AM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote: > So, essentially your argument is that having the Debian Games Team > mailing list as the official maintainer is solely a way to bypass > the normal Debian procedures of NMU and adoption. I think that > bypassing these procedures is

Bug#506809: oolite: new upstream release (1.73)

2010-08-18 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 08/17/2010 09:36 PM, Ludovic Brenta wrote: > > My other questions re: the Uploaders field remain. > If you have changes fixing rc bugs, then you might add this change. Otherwise, no. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ

Bug#506809: oolite: new upstream release (1.73)

2010-08-18 Thread Ludovic Brenta
So, essentially your argument is that having the Debian Games Team mailing list as the official maintainer is solely a way to bypass the normal Debian procedures of NMU and adoption. I think that bypassing these procedures is in fact a bad thing. They exist for good reason and it is importa

Bug#506809: oolite: new upstream release (1.73)

2010-08-17 Thread Stephen Kitt
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 06:19:27PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote: > I'm about to sponsor the package by Nicolas Boulenguez (1.74.2) into > unstable. I have already built the package and am testing it. Before I > upload, I have a pair of questions. From the debian/control in the > proposed new vers

Bug#506809: oolite: new upstream release (1.73)

2010-08-17 Thread Ludovic Brenta
Mehdi Dogguy writes: > On 08/17/2010 06:42 PM, Yavor Doganov wrote: >> Ludovic Brenta wrote: >>> Any objections, please raise your hand. >> >> We're in the begining of a GNUstep transition, which is unfortunately >> blocked by serious issues on hppa. As the release team is unlikely >> to approve

Bug#506809: oolite: new upstream release (1.73)

2010-08-17 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 08/17/2010 06:42 PM, Yavor Doganov wrote: > Ludovic Brenta wrote: >> Any objections, please raise your hand. > > We're in the begining of a GNUstep transition, which is unfortunately > blocked by serious issues on hppa. As the release team is unlikely > to approve a new upstream release at thi

Bug#506809: oolite: new upstream release (1.73)

2010-08-17 Thread Yavor Doganov
Ludovic Brenta wrote: > Any objections, please raise your hand. We're in the begining of a GNUstep transition, which is unfortunately blocked by serious issues on hppa. As the release team is unlikely to approve a new upstream release at this point, any eventual problems in oolite must be address

Bug#506809: oolite: new upstream release (1.73)

2010-08-17 Thread Ludovic Brenta
tags 506809 pending thanks I'm about to sponsor the package by Nicolas Boulenguez (1.74.2) into unstable. I have already built the package and am testing it. Before I upload, I have a pair of questions. From the debian/control in the proposed new version I see: Maintainer: Debian Games Team