On 08/04/2013 20:18, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
I have to apologize but I have been overwhelmed by stuff and I have to
cut back. I am sure you will find someone else to sponsor this.
I know the feeling all too well! Thanks for all your advice; it helped a
lot in getting the package into shap
James,
I have to apologize but I have been overwhelmed by stuff and I have to
cut back. I am sure you will find someone else to sponsor this.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.or
James,
Thanks. I have downloaded and I will look.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On 26 Nov 2012, at 21:37, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
> 1.) I didn't notice it first time but the last paragraph of the long
> description is a bit like advertising.
I see what you mean. I've removed some of it and reworded the rest. Does that
look OK now?
> 2.) The upstream changelog issue is stil
James.
I still have a few issues:
1.) I didn't notice it first time but the last paragraph of the long
description is a bit like advertising.
2.) The upstream changelog issue is still there. I seem to recall
suggesting some solutions but at the least there should be a lintian
override.
3
James,
I got round to downloading the package today.
On 27/10/12 15:47, James McDonald wrote:
> Hi Nicholas,
>
> Finally found some time to implement these changes!
>
> On 21 Sep 2012, at 01:56, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
>
>> I followed your advice and it works. I can see the attract
James,
Thanks. Unfortunately I have got two RC bugs that need fixing urgently.
It may be a week or more before I can get round to looking at it. But as
said before I don't think there are any major issues preventing upload.
On 27/10/12 15:47, James McDonald wrote:
> Hi Nicholas,
>
> Final
Hi Nicholas,
Finally found some time to implement these changes!
On 21 Sep 2012, at 01:56, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
> I followed your advice and it works. I can see the attraction of using
> cwm this way. However it might just be a step too far for me as copy and
> paste seems not to work.
James,
I am delighted to hear from you.
I followed your advice and it works. I can see the attraction of using
cwm this way. However it might just be a step too far for me as copy and
paste seems not to work.
I have managed to get cwm sort of working. If I edit
/etc/xdg/lx
On 16 Sep 2012, at 14:18, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Hi Nicholas,
Thanks for your comments!
> So here are some stupid questions for starters:
> 1,) I'm running LXDE and openbox and I know nothing about X11. How do I
> get cwm working? Could I have that in a README.Debian file please?
It should sim
James,
I use LXDE and I would like give cwm a go. If I can get it working on
my system I'll certainly work with you to get it uploaded into Debian. I
would not really call myself a competent X11 administrator so maybe I am
not your ideal uploader. On the other hand maybe I'm ideal because I
retitle 505924 RFP: cwm -- a lightweight and efficient window manager for X11
noowner 505924
thanks
Hi,
This is an automatic email to change the status of cwm back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 18 months.
If y
12 matches
Mail list logo
