On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 23:30:54 +0300
Eddy Petrișor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Still, don't be hasty, I can't get the sample since when I saved the file
> with both the sans and the
> serif ô, closed OOo writer and reopened the file ... tum-tum tum-tum, both
> types were correct TA-DA!
>
> I tire
Eddy Petrișor a scris:
> 2008/10/9 Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Quoting Eddy Petri?or ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>>> Package: ttf-liberation
>>> Version: 1.04~beta2-2
>>> Severity: important
>>> Tags: l10n upstream
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> In the attached image you can see that the same word,
2008/10/9 Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Quoting Eddy Petri?or ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>> Package: ttf-liberation
>> Version: 1.04~beta2-2
>> Severity: important
>> Tags: l10n upstream
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> In the attached image you can see that the same word, "Hôpitaux" has
>> rendered the cha
Quoting Eddy Petri?or ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: ttf-liberation
> Version: 1.04~beta2-2
> Severity: important
> Tags: l10n upstream
>
> Hello,
>
> In the attached image you can see that the same word, "Hôpitaux" has
> rendered the character "ô" (o circumflex) correctly for the serif
> varian
Package: ttf-liberation
Version: 1.04~beta2-2
Severity: important
Tags: l10n upstream
Hello,
In the attached image you can see that the same word, "Hôpitaux" has
rendered the character "ô" (o circumflex) correctly for the serif
variant, but the sans version of the font contains another gliph, nam
5 matches
Mail list logo
