> > Would you be so kind to check if all tools provided by dvipdfm
> > actually have an equivalent in dvipdfmx?
> >
> IIRC in sarge dvipdfm was still a separate package. That should help
> to find out, which binaries are provided by dvipdfm.
No, it was a virtual package provided by tetex-bin. A
On 20.02.09 Hilmar Preusse (hill...@web.de) wrote:
> On 20.02.09 Jens Noritzsch (b...@jens.noritzsch.de) wrote:
Hi,
> > BTW, an ebb replacement (extractbb) has been added to dvipdfmx in
> > 2008 so there is no obvious reason anymore to keep the dvipdfm part
> > of texlive-base-bin.
> >
> Would y
On 20.02.09 Jens Noritzsch (b...@jens.noritzsch.de) wrote:
Hi,
> Many thanks for your work on this, Hilmar. Should I open a new bug
> report in order to support the removal of dvipdfm? For now, the
> request remains hidden (and unrecognized) in bug logs...
>
Yes, please do.
> BTW, an ebb repl
Oops (sent too early),
see http://project.ktug.or.kr/pipermail/dvipdfmx/2008-May/01.html
for details on extractbb...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
Many thanks for your work on this, Hilmar. Should I open a new bug
report in order to support the removal of dvipdfm? For now, the request
remains hidden (and unrecognized) in bug logs...
BTW, an ebb replacement (extractbb) has been added to dvipdfmx in 2008
so there is no obvious reason an
notforwarded 428014
reassign 428014 texlive-base-bin
merge 501293 428014
reassign 322713 texlive-base-bin
tags 322713 + wontfix
stop
On 20.02.09 Jens Noritzsch (b...@jens.noritzsch.de) wrote:
Hi,
> > Didn't we want drop dvipdfm in the favour of dvipdfmx once?
>
> Well, then please raise the sev
Hi,
> Didn't we want drop dvipdfm in the favour of dvipdfmx once?
Well, then please raise the severity again and retitle the bug(s)
'dvipdfm should be dropped in favor of dvipdfmx' so that it does not
vanish from the radar again... (?)
> Jens, I guess this is a duplicate of #458209. As you can w
severity 501293 normal
retitle 501293 "dvipdfm: eps figures are misaligned"
merge 501293 458209
stop
On 18.02.09 Jens Noritzsch (b...@jens.noritzsch.de) wrote:
Hi all,
> Additional info, which shouldn't get lost in control messages:
> dvipdfmx works fine and it's just a fault of dvipdfm - the
>
Hi,
Additional info, which shouldn't get lost in control messages:
dvipdfmx works fine and it's just a fault of dvipdfm - the corresponding
change never made it to dvipdfmx...
Cheers, Jens
p.s. this affects every version of texlive-base-bin ever been in debian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de
Hi,
> Do you have the seem problem with dvipdfm? if so, I will assign this
> bug to texlive-base-bin, and ask them to fix config.
Same problem in dvipdfm and dvipdfmx. So, please proceed. I wasn't
aware that
/etc/texmf/dvipdfm/config/config
belongs to texlive-base-bin.
Thanks, Jens
Hi
Do you have the seem problem with dvipdfm? if so, I will assign this
bug to texlive-base-bin, and ask them to fix config.
Regards,
Yu Guanghui
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Jens Noritzsch wrote:
> Package: dvipdfmx
> Version: 1:20080607-1
> Severity: important
>
> [cf. https://
Package: dvipdfmx
Version: 1:20080607-1
Severity: important
[cf. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dvipdfmx/+bug/132601]
Any eps figure that I include with, for instance,
\includegraphics[width=.49\textwidth]{example.eps}
is moved about 15mm to the left and to the bottom. Becau
12 matches
Mail list logo
