Bug#492834: libquicktime1: New upstream release 1.0.3

2008-08-08 Thread Loïc Minier
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > tags 492834 + fixed-in-experimental > tags 492834 + pending > thanks > > Dammit, forgot to close the bug. Will do when uploaded to unstable. fixed-in-experimental is deprecated, you can simply mail -done with a "Version:" pseudo header mentionning

Bug#492834: libquicktime1: New upstream release 1.0.3

2008-08-08 Thread Fabian Greffrath
tags 492834 + fixed-in-experimental tags 492834 + pending thanks Dammit, forgot to close the bug. Will do when uploaded to unstable. -- Dipl.-Phys. Fabian Greffrath Ruhr-Universität Bochum Lehrstuhl für Energieanlagen und Energieprozesstechnik (LEAT) Universitätsstr. 150, IB 3/134 D-44780 Bochum

Bug#492834: libquicktime1: New upstream release 1.0.3

2008-08-04 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Fabian Greffrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In case someone is interested, I consider the libquicktime 1.0.3 > packages targeted at experimental in our SVN ready for sponsoring. I > did not include a symbols file, though... FTBFS: checking for _FILE_OFFSET_BITS value needed for large files..

Bug#492834: libquicktime1: New upstream release 1.0.3

2008-08-04 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Oops, it seems I had doxygen installed. I believe it will be a good idea to create a libquicktime-doc package to put the doxygen documentation in. Reinhard Tartler schrieb: Fabian Greffrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: In case someone is interested, I consider the libquicktime 1.0.3 packag

Bug#492834: libquicktime1: New upstream release 1.0.3

2008-08-04 Thread Fabian Greffrath
In case someone is interested, I consider the libquicktime 1.0.3 packages targeted at experimental in our SVN ready for sponsoring. I did not include a symbols file, though... Sebastian Dröge schrieb: Am Donnerstag, den 31.07.2008, 18:20 +0200 schrieb Fabian Greffrath: Sebastian Dröge schrieb

Bug#492834: libquicktime1: New upstream release 1.0.3

2008-07-31 Thread Sebastian Dröge
Am Donnerstag, den 31.07.2008, 18:20 +0200 schrieb Fabian Greffrath: > Sebastian Dröge schrieb: > > Yes and if you use symbol files a version bump for the functions where > > this enum could be returned or used as a parameter. > > But not another soname bump, right? No > Well, is there something

Bug#492834: libquicktime1: New upstream release 1.0.3

2008-07-31 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Sebastian Dröge schrieb: Yes and if you use symbol files a version bump for the functions where this enum could be returned or used as a parameter. But not another soname bump, right? Well, is there something like a step-by-step guide on how to add symbols files? -- Dipl.-Phys. Fabian Gref

Bug#492834: libquicktime1: New upstream release 1.0.3

2008-07-31 Thread Sebastian Dröge
Am Donnerstag, den 31.07.2008, 17:34 +0200 schrieb Fabian Greffrath: > Hi all, > > I've prepared libquicktime_1.0.3 packages for experimental in our SVN. > If you like to sponsor them, please run the get-orig-source rule in > debian/rules first to obtain the appropriate tarball. > > A diff betw

Bug#492834: libquicktime1: New upstream release 1.0.3

2008-07-31 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Hi all, I've prepared libquicktime_1.0.3 packages for experimental in our SVN. If you like to sponsor them, please run the get-orig-source rule in debian/rules first to obtain the appropriate tarball. A diff between the exported headers of the 1.0.2 and 1.0.3 version showed the following. Do

Bug#492834: libquicktime1: New upstream release 1.0.3

2008-07-30 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Pierre Chifflier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If such uploads should be avoided, then maybe this should be explained > clearly on d-d-a. This is pretty much my understanding of the last mail on d-d-a: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2008/07/msg7.html In essence, I read the f

Bug#492834: libquicktime1: New upstream release 1.0.3

2008-07-30 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Thanks for your clarification. If I find some time I'll prepare the new upstream version for experimental. Loïc Minier schrieb: On Wed, Jul 30, 2008, Christian Marillat wrote: Strange when other bug report like 492963 is fixed in 30 minutes... Well glpi doesn't honor the lenny freeze then;

Bug#492834: libquicktime1: New upstream release 1.0.3

2008-07-30 Thread Loïc Minier
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008, Pierre Chifflier wrote: > I thought the freeze was here to prevent new versions to enter testing, > not to upload into unstable. My understanding is that unstable remains the preferred path to testing; the technical effect of the freeze is indeed to prevent new versions to

Bug#492834: libquicktime1: New upstream release 1.0.3

2008-07-30 Thread Pierre Chifflier
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 02:39:52PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote: > On Wed, Jul 30, 2008, Christian Marillat wrote: > > Strange when other bug report like 492963 is fixed in 30 minutes... > > Well glpi doesn't honor the lenny freeze then; the new version wont > reach lenny and if the lenny version ne

Bug#492834: libquicktime1: New upstream release 1.0.3

2008-07-30 Thread Loïc Minier
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008, Christian Marillat wrote: > Strange when other bug report like 492963 is fixed in 30 minutes... Well glpi doesn't honor the lenny freeze then; the new version wont reach lenny and if the lenny version needs an update, it will have to go via t-p-u instead of unstable which

Bug#492834: libquicktime1: New upstream release 1.0.3

2008-07-30 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Strange when other bug report like 492963 is fixed in 30 minutes... Interesting, indeed. -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E

Bug#492834: libquicktime1: New upstream release 1.0.3

2008-07-30 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I need this version to build gmerlin for my repository. But if this is > really a problem I can do my own packages for my repository. Would having that package in experimental help you? You could copy the source/binary packages there at least. Or

Bug#492834: libquicktime1: New upstream release 1.0.3

2008-07-30 Thread Christian Marillat
Reinhard Tartler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Fabian Greffrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> This is unlikely to happen before the release of Lenny. > > An upload to experimental would be totally appropriate. > > Christian, do you need the new version soon for other packages or > something? I

Bug#492834: libquicktime1: New upstream release 1.0.3

2008-07-30 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Fabian Greffrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This is unlikely to happen before the release of Lenny. An upload to experimental would be totally appropriate. Christian, do you need the new version soon for other packages or something? -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4

Bug#492834: libquicktime1: New upstream release 1.0.3

2008-07-30 Thread Christian Marillat
Fabian Greffrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This is unlikely to happen before the release of Lenny. Strange when other bug report like 492963 is fixed in 30 minutes... Christian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTE

Bug#492834: libquicktime1: New upstream release 1.0.3

2008-07-30 Thread Fabian Greffrath
This is unlikely to happen before the release of Lenny. Cheers, Fabian Christian Marillat schrieb: Package: libquicktime1 Version: 2:1.0.2+debian-2+b1 Severity: normal Hi, Please update to this version. Christian -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT

Bug#492834: libquicktime1: New upstream release 1.0.3

2008-07-29 Thread Christian Marillat
Package: libquicktime1 Version: 2:1.0.2+debian-2+b1 Severity: normal Hi, Please update to this version. Christian -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: L