Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Kurt Roeckx writes ("Bug#488039: policy: chown uses owner:group not
> owner.group"):
>> There are several places in policy that use something like "root.root",
>> when talking about the owner and group of a f
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx writes ("Bug#488039: policy: chown uses owner:group not
> owner.group"):
> > There are several places in policy that use something like "root.root",
> > when talking about the owner and group of a file. P
Ian Jackson wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx writes ("Bug#488039: policy: chown uses owner:group not
> owner.group"):
>> There are several places in policy that use something like "root.root",
>> when talking about the owner and group of a file. People used to use
>
Kurt Roeckx writes ("Bug#488039: policy: chown uses owner:group not
owner.group"):
> There are several places in policy that use something like "root.root",
> when talking about the owner and group of a file. People used to use
> that notation to separate the ow
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.8.0.1
Severity: minor
There are several places in policy that use something like "root.root",
when talking about the owner and group of a file. People used to use
that notation to separate the owner and group, and it
still works, but the proper notation would be
5 matches
Mail list logo
