Chris Lamb wrote:
> if this package's functionality depends entirely on bazaar, it should
> probably be dropped as well.
It seems that pybaz falls into this category. Would you like me to take care
of filing bugs for pybaz's reverse-dependencies?
Regards,
--
Chris Lamb, UK
severity 454313 serious
severity 486728 wishlist
thanks
> tailor does not depend on "bazaar". It is only a suggest (with a lot of
> other SCM)
I think you confused the bug numbers in your control messages. :) Fixing..
Regards,
--
Chris Lamb, UK [EMAIL PR
unblock 454313 by 486728
thanks
Vincent Danjean wrote:
> I do not plan to remove it until bazaar is removed from unstable AND
> stable (backports are easier and a non working suggest in Debian does
> no harm)
Indeed; I did not interpret the output of "apt-cache rdepends bazaar"
correctly. Unbloc
severity 454313 wishlist
thanks
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Package: tailor
> Version: 0.9.35-1
> Severity: important
>
> Please drop the dependency on "bazaar" so it can be removed from the
> archive; see #454313 for more.
tailor does not depend on "bazaar". It is only a suggest (with a lot of
other SC
Package: tailor
Version: 0.9.35-1
Severity: important
Please drop the dependency on "bazaar" so it can be removed from the
archive; see #454313 for more.
(Of course, if this package's functionality depends entirely on bazaar, it
should probably be dropped as well. I have made no such judgement on
5 matches
Mail list logo
