On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 02:39:01PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > And they are all in the
> > risk of losing data.
>
> Please explain. Data not reaching the disk is something which can't be
> avoided in a crash situation. Data loss in the kernel con
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 01:49:51PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:49:36AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> And they are all in the
> risk of losing data.
Please explain. Data not reaching the disk is something which can't b
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:49:36AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> > Not sure whether the severity is correct,
>
> No. There are many system which don't choke on this.
Right, but there are also many systems choking. And they are all in the
risk of losing data.
> The patch is applied upstream fo
severity 479709 important
close 479709 2.6.26-1
thanks
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:49:36AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> Not sure whether the severity is correct,
No. There are many system which don't choke on this.
> I doubt it's a good idea to have this kernel in Lenny, especially
> with
severity 479709 grave
thanks
Not sure whether the severity is correct, but this time the bug hit me
with a dataloss and I suppose that others might/will experience the
same. I doubt it's a good idea to have this kernel in Lenny, especially
with the patch being that easy.
Michael
--
Michael Meske
5 matches
Mail list logo
