On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 06:20:10PM +0200, Christian Meyer wrote:
> Thank you. Your patch did half of the work:
>
> "Welcome to GRUB!" is displayed for half a second or so (instead of 5 - 7
> before),
>
> The remaining problem is:
> the screen turns black for 5 more seconds before graphical menu
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 10:09:33PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Saturday 05 July 2008, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > #477083: grub-pc: Is excruciatingly slow when compared to grub (legacy)
> >
> > It has been closed by Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
>
> That really fixed it! The only t
On Saturday 05 July 2008, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> #477083: grub-pc: Is excruciatingly slow when compared to grub (legacy)
>
> It has been closed by Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
That really fixed it! The only thing that still remains is the slow
build-up of the display (title ->
Christian Meyer schrieb:
"Welcome to GRUB!" is displayed for half a second or so (instead of 5 - 7
before),
Same improvement here! The menu is still sluggish, though.
The remaining problem is:
the screen turns black for 5 more seconds before graphical menu is displayed.
For me it seems to ha
Package: grub-pc
Version: 1.96+20080626-1
Followup-For: Bug #477083
i seem to have an absurdly slow boot as well, taking quite some time to
even get around to displaying the menu.
when i comment out the "insmod lvm" line it boots reasonably fast.
i've got / on an lvm'ed f
I can confirm this behaviour, especially "takes 10 seconds to get to the menu"
(#476479) on REAL Hardware.
I'm cainloading grub2 via grub legacy [kernel (hd0,8)/boot/grub/core.img]
My hardware:
AMD Duron 1200 (K7)
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-7VKML KM266
256 MB DDR-RAM
On-Board LAN (Build in RTL810
FYI, I'm getting the same slowness issue described using QEMU (with
KQEMU), so the problem must have something to do with being run in a
virtual environment. This is on an Athlon K7.
Best regards,
Nathan A. Stine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
On Thursday 24 April 2008, Robert Millan wrote:
> What are the constraints in your test environment? I assume CPU will be
> ultra-slow but disk access (through BIOS) relatively fast?
There are no real constraints that I know of. Sure CPU is slower than on
real hardware, but certainly no "ultra s
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 10:35:35PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
>
> I have tried grub-pc a few times during my installation tests and
> noticed that it is really significantly slower than grub "legacy".
> This may or may not be very visible on real hardware, but in Virtualbox
> (running on a fast, mode
Frans Pop schrieb:
I have tried grub-pc a few times during my installation tests and
noticed that it is really significantly slower than grub "legacy".
This may or may not be very visible on real hardware, but in Virtualbox
(running on a fast, modern host system) the difference is 30 seconds.
I
Package: grub-pc
Version: 1.96+20080413-1
Severity: important
I have tried grub-pc a few times during my installation tests and
noticed that it is really significantly slower than grub "legacy".
This may or may not be very visible on real hardware, but in Virtualbox
(running on a fast, modern host
11 matches
Mail list logo
