On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 04:52:09PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
>> Darcs 2 is now in Sid, can anyone tell me if this bug can / cannot
>> still be reproduced with 2.0.0-4?
>
> (sid)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ darcs get [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/foobarfuzz
>
> darcs failed: Not a repository: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
Trent W. Buck wrote:
> Hi, I'm the new Debian maintainer for Darcs.
good that somebody is taking care of this now!
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 11:41:21PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
>> Isaac, what about upgrading the package to 2.0 (or orphaning/RFAing it
>> in case you don't have the time to
Hi, I'm the new Debian maintainer for Darcs.
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 11:41:21PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Isaac, what about upgrading the package to 2.0 (or orphaning/RFAing it
> in case you don't have the time to work on it?)
>
> This bug only affects sparc, so I'm lowering the severity.
Dar
severity 475529 important
thanks
> (There *are* patches to pull.)
Indeed.
Isaac, what about upgrading the package to 2.0 (or orphaning/RFAing it
in case you don't have the time to work on it?)
This bug only affects sparc, so I'm lowering the severity.
It seems ssh is started, but the weird th
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 05:05:14PM +0200,
Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 16 lines which said:
> Apparently it's --no-ssh-cm.
Same problem, even after 'aptitude dist-upgrade' this morning.
% darcs pull --no-ssh-cm
%
(There *are* patches to pull.)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 08:01:14AM -0700,
David Roundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 12 lines which said:
> I see, it's perhaps been renamed to --no-ssh-cm?
Indeed, but it doesn't help:
% darcs pull --no-ssh-cm
%
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 16:58:27 +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 07:29:28AM -0700,
> David Roundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> a message of 22 lines which said:
>
> > Have you tried running with --disable-ssh-cm?
>
> % darcs pull --disable-ssh-cm
>
> darcs failed:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 07:29:28AM -0700,
David Roundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 22 lines which said:
> Have you tried running with --disable-ssh-cm?
% darcs pull --disable-ssh-cm
darcs failed: unrecognized option `--disable-ssh-cm'
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 02:54:43PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> Package: darcs
> Version: 1.0.9-1.1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
It seems an overstatement to mark this as grave, given that darcs can be
used perfectly well without ssh by almost every user.
> %
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 02:54:43PM +0200,
Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 44 lines which said:
> Every network-using command (pull, push, get) behaves the same.
>
> darcs changes, revert, record or get/pull/push with local repositories
> work fine.
Sorry, I forgot t
Package: darcs
Version: 1.0.9-1.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
% darcs get [EMAIL PROTECTED]:Blog
%
Every network-using command (pull, push, get) behaves the same.
darcs changes, revert, record or get/pull/push with local repositories
work fine.
ssh is working proper
11 matches
Mail list logo
