Bug#474778: debchange: new NMU handling is highly questionable

2008-04-27 Thread Adam D. Barratt
[NB Not discussing whether the feature should have been enabled by default, but whether that should be changed now that it _is_ enabled] On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 20:56 +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > (Replying to correct cloned BR for second issue.) > > On Monday 07 April 2008, Luk Claes wrote: > > Frans

Bug#474778: debchange: new NMU handling is highly questionable

2008-04-07 Thread Frans Pop
(Replying to correct cloned BR for second issue.) On Monday 07 April 2008, Luk Claes wrote: > Frans Pop wrote: > > + Set urgency=high if NMU and no other urgency set > > > > This is the most questionable change as it invites abuse of urgency. > > Indeed, I was not aware that it was changed already